Yuneec Typhoon H

Yuneec announced the Typhoon H at CES 2016. It’s a hexacopter with retractable landing gear and a detachable camera that shoots UHD 4K. The specs and demos at CES impressed us enough that we gave it our Best Drone of CES 2016 award. On paper, it’s very cool. In fact, we started this review thinking that it could be the DJI Phantom 4 killer. We were rooting for any drone that could bring real competition to the drone market. However, we didn't have the experience we were hoping for. 

Yuneec’s Story

Before we jump into the specs of the Typoon H, lets give a little back story for Yuneec, as they aren’t a brand everyone is aware of. Yuneec was founded back in 1999, but in 2014 they made the Typhoon Q500 quadcopter. In 2015, Intel invested $60 million into Yuneec, starting a partnership for further development.

With an MSRP of $1,300, the Yuneec Typhoon H is $100 less than the DJI Phantom 4. It’s capable of shooting up to 30 fps in UHD 4k and up to 120fps in Full HD. As video nerds, we were excited to see what it could do.


8 Tips for Making a Stellar First Video

Free eBook


8 Tips for Making a Stellar First Video

Free eBook


Thank you! Your free eBook will be sent to you via email

Yuneec touts that their flight time with the H is up to 25 minutes. Although that wasn't our experience, it was pretty close, we had 4 flights with a range of 20-23 minutes. All of those flights were quite different. They ranged from demanding high performance flying  to light, mostly hovering flights.

The retractable landing gear is a nice touch and a very big competitive edge over the Phantom 4. You’d have to step up to the Inspire 1 to get retractable landing gear with a DJI drone. There is a huge distinction, though, between the Inspire 1 and the Typhoon H — the build quality and perceived strength of design. Now we put the landing gear to a strength test, but the look, feel and flight characteristics are quite different from that of the Inspire 1. The H is lighter weight and more complex, and we would not project that it would have a longer life than the Inspire 1. However, because the landing gear retracts, it allows for 360-degree camera pan, rotation of the drone is not needed.

The Typhoon H has a detachable 3-axis gimbal and UHD 4K camera. Again, that is an option only rivaled by the Inspire 1 in the DJI line up. We must point out that we had an issue with the rubber shock mounts for the gimbal right at its detaching point. One of the four mounts was not connected, and it came this way new from the manufacturer. It was a bit of a pain to get it connected again, but we were able to remedy it.

Our Story

The First Flights

Let’s start off with our very first flight. We powered up what Yuneec calls the ground station, which is their name for the controller. We let it start up, then powered up the drone itself. Stepping back to a safe distance, we readied for flight. This is where another problem became apparent: Although we could take off, it seemed that the camera was not connecting with the ground station. The problem turned out to be the camera’s connection to the drone. After moving the camera ever so slightly, the connection was made, and we were ready to fly. We should note that for the next four flights, we experienced that same connection problem when first powering up.

The ground station has a built-in LCD screen, so no need for a phone or tablet to monitor the flight. It’s truly an all in one purchase. You don't need to buy anything other than the drone to fly. It’s nice that you don't have to buy a monitor, but it made the controller really big. Because of its size, getting a comfortable grip on it was hard. A lanyard is a necessity. When using the controller, the sticks and switches are odd to use. This is especially noticeable if you are an RC pilot, as its form factor is unique. Overall, we found the ergonomics of the design to be weak.

In the air, the H is very fast and responds well to your control. It didn't feel heavy in the sky, but it wasn't floating around too much either. We couldn't put our finger on why it felt different from other drones, so we decided to keep our eye on it during future flights.

The Crash

It was our 5th flight. We were testing its stability hovering to see how much movement it had when trying to stay in one place. There was a slight breeze at 6 mph, but it didn't seem to be affecting the drone much while it was in the air. When hovering, it stayed within three feet of the central hover point in each direction. We also wanted to see how it felt when flying low, with the landing gear up and down. During these tests, we were shooting time-lapse of the flight for another review, and we landed briefly to turn off that second camera.

During the second part of flight number five, the Typhoon H went down. We were hovering around 30 feet in the air, slightly in front of our position. After about a minute in the air and when our hands were completely off the controller, it flew away fast — at what appeared to be full speed. We quickly looked down at the controller to see an error saying something to the effect of “rotor failure, please land safely.” We began to run after it, but it was quickly out of sight. We didn’t see it go down. When running in the general direction it flew off in, we thought that surely it had already hit the ground. Just then a man walking his dog came and indicated where it had crashed — on a construction site at least 400 yards away from where it went rogue.

The man said he saw it go down and “smash into a million pieces.” My heart sunk. We was hoping that it would have landed safely, but that wasn't the case. It ended up deep in a pile of dirt. Its lights were still blinking when we found it.

All the debris fell within five square feet of the crash site — except the camera. At the time of the fly-a-way, the landing gear was up, and it appeared to have landed belly down and camera first. We assume, because the camera is detachable and because the landing gear was up, it was projected far away. The camera was nowhere to be found. We searched for more than four hours but were unable to recover the camera. To add insult to injury, all of our footage had not yet to been removed from the microSD card that was in the camera. We lost all footage, including the crash, the camera was missing and the drone was all broken up — tragic.

broken Typhoon H
broken Typhoon H

Not many of the products we review here at Videomaker have an injury hazard like that of a drone. We feel we have have an ethical obligation to our audience that we tell them about the crash because someone could be maimed or horribly injured. This is a risk all drone pilots need to be aware of

After the Crash

After the crash it took me off my game. I have tons of drone flying experience, but the crash caused me to doubt my ability, even though I knew it wasn't my fault. After seeing the debris from how hard the drone crashed, my confidence to keep a drone from harming someone was severely affected. I have since regained it, but it gives me a new perspective on drone flying — there is real, unpredictable risk.

We notified Yuneec and postponed this review a month so we could test a new unit and either validate our experience or show that our crash was a fluke. However, as of today, Yuneec has offered no further contact or follow up on their promise to get us a replacement. We would have liked to be able to say that the crash was a unique experience, but without further testing, we have only our own disconcerting experience with Typhoon H to draw from.

Let’s Sum it Up

There are many video producers out there who would benefit from a drone with the specs of the Typhoon H. However, because of our experience, we cannot recommend it to anyone.

The Yuneec Typhoon H looks great on paper and in demos, but it had many problems, one of which could endanger those around you. There are several positive reviews of the Typhoon H, so we hope that our experience is an anomaly and that future Yuneec products don't suffer from the same issues.


Folds up for easy packing
Retractable landing gear
Built in monitor on the controler


Unreliable camera connection
Lost one rotor followed by fast flyaway and crash
Ground station isn't very ergonomic
Felt light in the sky

PRICE: MSRP $1,300


FLIGHT TIME: Up to 25 min
SIZE: 20.5x18x12.2 in (520x457x310mm)
TAKE-OFF WEIGHT: 368.8oz (1950g )
BATTERY: 4S 14.8V LiPo Battery (POWER 4)
BATTERY CAPACITY / VOLTAGE: 5400mAh 4S/14.8V?79.9Wh?
TRANSMITTER: ST16 Personal Station Ground
MAXIMUM FLYING HEIGHT: 122m(400ft) agl (Restricted by FAA )

EFFECTIVE PIXELS: 12.4 Megapixels
CAMERA LENS: 14mm/F2.8
FOV: 98 Degree
ELECTRONIC SHUTTER: 1/30s——–1/8000s
VIDEO: UHD 4K 30fps

Ground Station (Controler)
FCC Compliance: Up to 1.6km/1 mile CE Compliance: Up to 1.6km/1 mile

Chris Monlux is an avid RC plane pilot and loves flying drones. He is also Videomaker’s Multimedia Editor.


  1. Hey Chris, so sorry to hear of your fly away crash and negligent customer support. You can dig deeper to find out what happened by taking the telemetry data in your ST16 and uploading it to
    The ST16 also records low res footage from the CGO3+ receiver, so there is a folder with the video recordings of your last moments before losing connection with the camera. Just get in the file manager and copy to the microSD card.

    I have flown without problems, but there are some reports of software glitches that are being reported here . It is a great platform, seems yuneec needs to step up their firmware/software development to match the product brochure, but the video quality if really amazing and worth the investment. (curved cable cam rocks!

  2. Leading up to the release Yuneec made a heck of claim about it’s camera and that was what hooked me into buy one of these. 100Mbps data rate out of it’s 4K camera. 100Mbps! that would be 80% more data than from a GoPro Hero 4Black, it would be a game changer. So on release day I get my Typhoon H, actually read the instructions, charge the battery format the card and launch the drone. I send it up, my brother sends up my yuneec Typhoon G with a GoPro Hero 4 Black on its gimbal. we record some air to air and shoot the same shot at the same time. I ran all three looks on the Typhoon H’s camera and was running Protune on the Hero 4B. We land and hustle back to the desktop computer and download the video. This is where we start to see some issues. The Typhoon H files are smaller than the GP4B files. they should be 80% larger. so we verify that both cameras are running 4K and they are. so we pull up the info on the files and the the go pro is running 60Mbps as expected. the Typhoon H Raw is running 29Mbps, natural is running 36Mbps and Gorgous is 46Mbps. this can’t be right. We check again with other files and see the same results. then we start looking at the files Soft, no dynamic range and SOFT like out of focus soft. The GoPro KILLED it. Now I should mention I know what I’m looking at I’m a motion picture cameraman, my brother is still photographer and educator, we know what’s what.

    Since the CGO3+ is under warranty I hand deliver it to Yuneec and complain about the focus. They test it and say its “correct per design specs” I challenge that and ask if infinity is supposed to be soft on an aerial camera and they agree to replace it. Best comment from Yuneec when they were replacing the camera is their rep saying the lens is made by Ziess. Sorry but it’s not. Same thing happens with the 2nd camera. Soft and low resolution almost as if the lens was lacking in resolving power. Add a low resolution lens to a low bitrate processor and you get a camera that well frankly looks like garbage.

    Over the next few weeks Yuneec doesnt acknowledge the issue and the message boards are full of defenders claiming the camera looks great and that it’s “Professional grade” So I dive deeper into the camera and that the processor and System on a chip are lower grade the the gopro. It’s never going to be a high performance high quality camera, and Honestly Yuneec’s lack of addressing the image quality concerns is troubling. Add the closed software system which pales in comparison to the DJI flight software and all the third party solutions and you have a second tier system that originally had promise (The Q500 and Typhoon G flew fantastic) into a system that lacks future performance

  3. Hi!
    I also had some issues with my H Real Sence I bought in September. It was toilet bowling and rushing about after couple of flights, almost like loosing the control. After a four-weeks (professional and polite!) service and replacement of the compass platform, my Typhoon H Real Sence is flying rock-steady. So If your drone tends to drift or toilet bowl, you should take it down at once and perform accelerometer calibration on a flat level surface. I do it before every flight, just in case… I always let my drones to hover for a minute or two in 10-15 meters and check if everything is ok, before I launch it up.
    What it comes to camera, my footage compared to GoPro 4Black, raw footage video seemes to be quite the same quality. Good point to check out the bitrates, anyway, thank´s 😉

  4. First of all Chris Monlux, thank you for your review and super detailed experience testing the Yuneec H drone. I bought my drone 3 weeks ago, and I decided to go slowly since I am not drone expert pilot. After my third test flight, the drone spine up 1000 feet without control, then started traveling north without control, showing an error message in the remote controls like ” critical error failure “. Long history short, after 600 feet the drone crashed on the street. The photos provided by Chris are very similar to the damages I have in mine. After recovery of my emotional trauma, feeling like I made a mistake. But , I work in IT and my instinct tell me that I should look for the error in the system. Since the remote control of the Typhoon H is an Adroid cell phone, I connected to my pc and I discovered very interesting files. Per example, that the drone has been used previously ( or at least the components ) in different time during 2016. Anyway, I had to sent the drone to Yuneec to fix the broken landing train, camera and a propel arm.

Comments are closed.