Is Documentary Real?

For most of us, the documentary genre is a very real and raw form of story telling that is based on true-life emotion. We watch as our main character struggles with issues, narrates the frustration and we patiently wait for the resolution. As a matter of fact, for most documentary movie buffs out there you may notice that the honest non-subjective documentary you love took just as much planning as the latest big summer blockbuster.

This is because documentary films tell the same character-driven stories that contain a beginning, middle and end, with an issue at hand to keep viewers interested just like any other Hollywood film. The idea that a documentary is real and a mainstream release isnt is wrong.
All documentary films are subjective, no matter how they are put together. There is a storyteller, who may be using real events to tell the story, but they are still telling the story that they want the viewer to see. It does not matter how neutral a stance on the subject they take, or how objective the documentary may seem. In the end there is always the filmmaker, who chooses what story should be told and how they are going to tell it. It is up to the filmmaker to edit out information that may show another side to the story. If three documentary purists were put in a room and asked to film the same story, each story would end up different. Because every filmmaker tells the story that they find the most interesting. If the art of making a documentary film was indeed “real” every documentary would be a lot less entertaining and probably only contain one static shot. Therefore, in my opinion documentary film is not objective, and is not as real as people tend to think it is.

I want to present this issue and see what some of our readers think. Are documentary films real? Are they subjective? Are they just as phony as the last Indiana Jones movie? Let us know what you think.

Avatar
Associate Editor tskowronski@videomaker.com VM Customer Support: 1-800-284-3226

4 COMMENTS

  1. I like the documentary style and completely agree with you. This is something I’ve thought about for a while but never said anything about. Personally, I like being able to tell one side of a story to make someone or something look good or bad, or create strong feelings in the viewer. Whether or not that’s moral or not, I don’t care.

  2. And you shouldn’t have to. We should always be striving to tell the story the best way that we can. My issue here is more based in how documentary films are sold and promoted. To say that a documentary doesn’t have to set up shots, and that whatever happens happens is not true.

  3. Well I think there are times when you’re out shooting and you have to huck it, but there is no way a whole documentary can be made with the mentality “whatever happens, happens.” There is going to be lots of planning, and if they are shooting in a situation with no control, they will do even more planning.

  4. i mean to say “there is no way a whole documentary can be made with the mentality ‘whatever happens, happens’ and still be considered a quality video.

LEAVE A REPLY

Please enter your comment!
Please enter your name here