Videomaker – Learn video production and editing, camera reviews › Forums › Technique › Sound › Copyright subjects › Pedro – I think maybe your
Pedro – I think maybe your English is confusing the problem. Legal English is very different – words have very important meanings.
Youtube very sophisticated algorithms to identify the origin of the music content, and frequently a piece of music not in their database will have similarities with others that are. As many users attempt to get around copyright, they look for many features – often suggested to be pitch, rhythm, tempo, and unusual but identifiable envelope characteristics. They then flag it up, and send you their pre-packaged “you may be using music that is subject to copyright” stuff. You simply provide evidence of ownership or control of the rights and they assign them back to you, and you can monetise your videos. The problem comes when your music is similar to an already copyrighted and identifiable work. You then have to make a good case and become ‘an expert’. They have done it to some of my music, which was similar to, but different from the work they identified. You persevere and you get there – however, they speak English in an official form, and you don’t. Your conversational English is not sufficient to argue accurately – the meaning will get lost. I urge you to find a friend who can understand the necessity to be precise. I certainly couldn’t do this in Portuguese so you just need some help in English. Google translate will NOT be good enough.
In copyright issues – remember that if they mis-identify your intellectual property and pay somebody else for it’s use – then they are in error, and copyright law will side with you – so do not give up.