Has anyone compared the footage from these cameras? On paper it doesn't look like there's any reason to spend the money on the 5D if all I want to do is shoot video.
Canon 6D vs 5D Mark III
Has anyone compared the footage from these cameras? On paper it doesn't look like there's any reason to spend the money on the 5D if all I want to do is shoot video.
Sony FS7 II Hands-On Review
Max - like the $2797 D800, the $1997 D600 has a serious problem with moire (shimmering, colored bands on patterned subjects such as brickwork, shingled roofs, striped clothing, etc.). This can be seen clearly in this side-by-side between the D600 and the $1249 Panasonic GH3:
The $3300 5D Mark III solves the moire problem - but, straight out of the box, it is not as sharp as the GH3:
If you are willing to modify your camera, there is a hack that allows the 5D Mark III to shoot RAW, surpassing the resolution and dynamic range of the GH3:
But this will significantly increase the amount of storage required to record your videos - and can be a challenge to deal with in the editing suite.
For video, I recommend the GH3 - straight out of the box, it is the best value-for-money large-sensor, interchangeable lens camera on the market.
Unlike the D600 and the 5D Mark III, it:
- records for hours continuously,
- has lightning fast and accurate video autofocus, and
- has a viewfinder that continues working in video mode.
Hope this is helpful,
Bill
Hybrid Camera Revolution
It is helful thank you. I'm thinking of trying GH3 as you suggested. :)
For Lighting rental Los Angeles, Visit Here.