Do I need a reference monitor?

Anonymous (not verified)

I'm a relative newbie video editor looking to expand my editing setup. I've read that I should be running a reference monitor other than my computer monitors. Is this only necessary for SD video? I deal exclusively with HD (or upconverted HD). Would that look the same on a reference monitor as on my cpu display?

If I DO need a ref monitor, what do you recommend? This might be a dumb question, but do I need an additional card to get from the computer to the monitor? Is there anything else I would need for this setup?

Thanks in advance for your help!

grinner's picture
Last seen: 8 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 12/29/2007 - 2:56am

Everyone editing content for broadcast needs to know what they are sending out so properly calibrated monitors, waveform monitors, and vectorscopes are required. I use Sony montors and tektronix scopes. If you are just uploading for the web, you can fly by youreye as legal colors/levels are not a requirement at all.

Rob Grauert's picture
Last seen: 4 years 2 months ago
Joined: 02/16/2008 - 10:47pm

Depending on your software, you might not need to invest in a waveform monitor or vector scope. Since FCP5, FCP analyzes every pixel of every line, and Color certainly has an accurate set of scopes as well...according to what I've read.

But Grinning is correct about needed a reference monitor if doing anything for broadcast.

And you will need some kind of an I/O card. AJA, Blackmagic Design, and Matrox are good brands. Don't get a GPU that has an HDMI output. That's not the same.

XTR-91's picture
Last seen: 3 months 3 weeks ago
Joined: 12/06/2008 - 8:57pm

"How would you rate this monitor?"


You'll needa

very fast computer.