Best Professional Quality Camera for under $3,000

Videomaker – Learn video production and editing, camera reviews Forums Technique Production Gear Best Professional Quality Camera for under $3,000

Viewing 9 reply threads
  • Author
    Posts
    • #44510
      AvatarAnonymous
      Inactive

      I make videos on YouTube and need a professional quality camera for 3 different kinds of filming:

      1. Filming interactions from far away (30-50 ft). I need about 4 hrs of battery life for this.

      2. Interviews from medium range (5-10 ft). I also need about 3-4 hours of continuous filming for this one.

      3. Vlogs from close range (3-6 ft). I would like this to have an effect where the background is blurred and the picture is focused only on the person talking.

      Since I have such a wide variety of uses for it, I was thinking of getting a DSLR but the battery life on those are not too long so I’d have to buy multiple batteries. Each battery only lasts about 30 minutes so even with a a battery extender (where you can put in 2 batteries at a time), I’d have to end up buying 8 batteries and keep switching them out.

      Another option would be to get a camcorder with an interchangeable lens (like the Sony NEX VG20) but these have worse reviews.

      Any other suggestions you guys can help me with? Thanks in advance.

    • #186368
      Avatarbrunerww
      Member

      If you want unlimited shooting time and shallow depth of field for less than $3000, your choices are pretty much the poorly-reviewed Sony VG20 or the well-reviewed Panasonic GH2 and a $21 AC adapter kit. No more batteries, and you can run the camera until your SD card fills up.

      Of course, if you want a real video camera with a 4 hour battery and can save up a few more bucks, the terrific Panasonic AF100 is on sale right now at Adorama for $4369. With a $500 mail in rebate, the bottom line is $3869. (of course, you’ll still need a $114 lens ;-))

      Hope this is helpful,

      Bill

      Hybrid Camera Revolution

    • #186369
      AvatarKenkyusha
      Participant

      @Kong- the battery life issue isn’t quite that stark, on the GH1 and GH2, I can get 3 + hours out of each battery (hacked/higher bit rates eat juice more quickly). One fully charged battery in unit and another waiting to go has gotten me through nearly a full shooting day.

    • #186370
      AvatarCharles
      Participant

      You can always check out the Panasonic HMC Ag150 as long as you have a good amount of distance between your subject and the background, blurring the background will be pretty easy. You can get a package from B&H photo for about $3500. Get the 64 gig HDSD card and you will have 6 hours of recording. Plus the kit comes with two batteries, one that lasts for about 1.5 hours and the other lasts 4 hours.

    • #186371
      AvatarCville
      Participant

      Kong

      Vimeo has a Sony NEX VG20 users forum. I am actually considering this camera. There are some very good reviews on this camera. Just depends who you read. On the Vimeo forum you can ask question of people who are actually using the camera. Some of the video I have seen posted from this camera is great. Sure it has some limitations. Every camera has them. You just have to decide which camera will work best in your situation.

      It is my understanding that most of the HDSLR’s will not do continuous shooting so that is probably not an option for you.

      Good luck with your decision. Let us know what you end up with and if you are happy with your choice.

      Tony

    • #186372
      Avatarbrunerww
      Member

      I did a side-by-side of the VG20 and the GH2 here: “Sony NEX-VG20 and Panasonic DMC-GH2: Side-by-side Comparison

      The VG20 produces high quality stills and shallow depth of field video,especially in low light – but in my opinion, at $1600 body-only, it is not worth $800 more than the GH2.

      Hope this is helpful,

      Bill

      Hybrid Camera Revolution

    • #186373
      Avatarcomposite1
      Member

      Kong,

      Up front, when I hear the words ‘YouTube’, I don’t think ‘professional’. I also don’t believe you’re going to get a professional kit for under $3k. Professional rigs give you much more control over your image and sound. That extra control costs money. The cameras mentioned by the other members are good choices, but they neglected to mention the accessories needed to accompany your camera. Extended power batteries are the more expensive types. You’re also going to need camera support, a good bag to protect your investment and the type of recording media for multiple long takes if you’re not using tape 16GB or better flash media can get pricey depending on what format the camera uses. Also, does your camera have built-in ND lenses? If not, you’re going to have to purchase them and good ones that won’t interfere with your image because of aberrations in the glass or pigment ain’t cheap either. If you’re looking for a DSLR, then the accessory expense can easily blow your budget just by getting one decent lens.

      You might want to get a lower-end prosumer rig to cut down on the amount of incidentals you’ll need. You’ll still get a quality image that will hold up after YouTube’s compression codec mangles it and you’ll have something useful if you decide to distribute on DVD or Blu-Ray should you choose.

    • #186374
      Avatarpapayamon
      Participant

      the hmc-150 is going for $2,795 at bhphoto. for what it’s worth, i’m buying another one of those.

    • #186375
      AvatarCharles
      Participant

      They have a nice kit for the 150 for about $3500 and the memory cards are coming down in price. You will also need a good tripod which will cost anywhere from $250 on up. I would save your pennies and get the best equipment that you can get, you will not be sorry.

      Doublehammer, I shoot pro-vids for YouTube all the time. They are essential back links to companies websites that help in Google ratings.

    • #186376
      Avatarbrunerww
      Member

      “Vlogs from close range (3-6 ft). I would like this to have an effect where the background is blurred and the picture is focused only on the person talking.”

      Sounds like Kong wants shallow depth of field from 6 feet away or less. So I’m confused as to why folks are recommending small sensor camcorders (unless they want him to buy a $4500 Letusto go with them)?

      It seems to me that only a $3000 or less large sensor camera or camcorder with 4+ hours of battery life (or an AC adapter) can meet his clearly stated cost, shot duration, and DoF requirements.

      Cheers,

      Bill

      Hybrid Camera Revolution

Viewing 9 reply threads
  • You must be logged in to reply to this topic.

Best Products

The best video editing plugins — 2021

An essential part of being a post-production specialist is knowing your tools and how to use them. But it is equally important to know when another tool will increase your ability and efficiency.
homicide-bootstrap