DJI Phantom helicopter with a GoPro camera flying in the sky

What is a Drone?

Strictly speaking, "drone" used to be defined as an autonomous aircraft. Now, the word is used as slang for anything without a human pilot on board. This can include anything from your local hobby store’s cheapest radio-controlled aircraft to a Predator or Global Hawk. What the rest of us call a drone, the FAA refers to as an unmanned aerial system or UAS.
Radio-controlled helicopters have been a pipe dream of videographers for decades. But until recently, cameras have been too heavy, or the use of video tape was too prohibitive to make it practical. Helicopters either couldn’t get off the ground, or tapes would be degaussed by the electromagnetic fields put out by the motors. 
With the use of tapeless media, and the stability of multi-rotor systems, it’s now practical to have a relatively low-cost platform to shoot video from. The first commercial multi-rotor system was known as the “Draganflyer” back in 1998. Compare that with the DJI Phantom’s modern guidance and cameras … you have a very effective aerial system.
Drones have been used around the world for every purpose from inspecting oil pipelines and electrical lines, to surveillance, search and rescue, and even weapons delivery systems. Originally, even the Predator drone was designed to take pictures and replace the U-2 and the SR-71 spy planes. However, since the Predator has been outfitted with weapons delivery capabilities it has sparked protests, debates, and even hysteria over many types of drones.
So understandably, when the average person hears the word drone, they are filled with a feeling of uncertainty, and in some cases dread or fear. 

Is it Legal to use a Drone to Shoot Video?

The short answer is both yes and no. There are many rules to flying an unmanned aerial system as presented by the Federation Aviation Administration. The most basic rules to follow (that should keep you safe, and the FAA off your case) are to keep your UAS in sight, never fly more than 400 feet above the ground (don’t fly within five miles of airports, and if you follow it everywhere, you’ll be pretty safe), never fly near people, and never fly where you can cause property damage. Basically, these are the same rules that you should follow when flying your standard hobby, electric, radio controlled aircraft.
Collage of a CarbonCore drone helicopter with camera attached and the remote control units with a laptop as viewer.
Collage of a CarbonCore drone helicopter with camera attached and the remote control units with a laptop as viewer.
Collage of a closeup of the drone’s camera and viewscreen of it’s flight path
You can fly any radio controlled aircraft with a camera on it. At least for now. There are currently 30 states attempting to outlaw radio-controlled aircraft with cameras on them. Where things really get dicey, is when flying a radio-controlled aircraft for commercial purposes (like shooting video).
According to Les Dorr (a spokesperson for the FAA out of Washington, D.C.) "…if you are taking video for your own personal use (including YouTube) and you're not going to do anything else with it, and you adhere to model aircraft guidelines, you're okay…" He continues, "…you cannot sell the video, and you cannot take money for shooting the video." Why? Because using unmanned aerial systems for commercial purposes is illegal.
So what about all of those drones that we saw at NAB last year? Well, in short they’re great for hobbyists. But you cannot (legally) make any money shooting video with a radio controlled aircraft. Again, at least for now. 

Can I at Least Get a Permit?

The good news is, that in 2012, President Barack Obama mandated the FAA to open the skies to private commercial drones by 2015. The bad news is that at the soonest you might be able to get a permit at the end of 2013. Our FAA spokesperson said, "…proposed small unmanned aircraft rules (under 55 pounds) could be coming out later this year and will likely cover this (shooting video with small aircraft commercially)…" Of course he did follow that up with, "we can't really speculate how long it will take to get out the final rule." So in reality, it could be as late as September 2015 by the time you can legally shoot video (and accept money for it) with a radio-controlled aircraft.

Using unmanned aerial systems for commercial purposes is illegal.

There are permits available for unmanned aerial systems at this time. But not for profit, and not for shooting video. The current permits being issued are called "experimental airworthiness certificates”and are for (again from our FAA spokesperson) "… Demonstrations only." 

And Then There are the States…

There are currently 30 states attempting to pass legislation against drones. Also, there are an additional seven states that have previously attempted to introduce such legislation but have ultimately failed. Since we're based in California, let's cover just a couple of points of California legislation.
There are currently two bills introduced. The first one is California Assembly Bill AB 1327. This bill covers how law enforcement, state, and federal agencies should be allowed to use drone technology. It also is designed to protect citizens’ privacy from being invaded by the government.
The second bill is the one you should pay attention to if you want to shoot video. This is California Senate Bill SB 15. The bill is being constantly revised, but as of December 3, 2012 it is designed to regulate, the use of remote-controlled aircraft with cameras mounted on board by private citizens for private or commercial use. (A small reminder, if you hire someone to shoot video for you, you are responsible for how this person shoots.) 

But I’ve Invested a Ton of Money in my UAS!

Collage of closeups of a DJI Phantom drone helicopter on the ground and in the air, and the remote controls.
Believe us, we sympathize. This author, has invested more than $20,000 in drone technology for shooting video. However, with the hysteria over drones the best advice we can give you is to ground it for now.
Even private citizens legally posting to YouTube are coming under scrutiny. The Kunde Family Estate (a family-owned vineyard) published video taken from a DJI quad-copter over their own vineyard on YouTube. In an article in the Press Democrat (a Santa Rosa, Calif. newspaper) called into question the flights’ legality. Furthermore, the paper quoted Lt. John Noland of the Santa Rosa Police Department mentioning "fly-by gang shootings" as crimes just around the corner. Needless to say, the hysteria surrounding the subject of drones requires more education and awareness.
This illustrates the prevailing attitudes and hysteria surrounding drones by both law enforcement and the general public. Also, it should tell you that you should not be surprised if you find a police officer tapping you on the shoulder (even if flying a multicopter as a hobbyist for personal enjoyment). 

So What if I Take my Chances?

Well, until the previously mentioned bills become settled … all you're really subject to are fines. However those fines can be pretty steep. Our FAA spokesperson mentioned an incident that took place in October 2011 involving a group known as “Team BlackSheep.”
Team BlackSheep are fairly well known among radio control enthusiasts that gather footage of landmarks around the world using their radio-controlled multicopters. The incident that our FAA spokesperson is referring to was of the team flying their UAS on the University of Virginia campus. Our FAA spokesperson was not informed of the final fine amount, but told us that "a $10,000 fine was proposed." 

So Where does This Leave Us?

The bottom line is that aerial video systems are still in a category of new technology that can be used for less than honorable purposes. As a result, the law hasn’t (yet) caught up with technology. After all, this author’s video system can be flown using a laptop with waypoints. What would stop someone from mounting an explosive rather than a camera? What would stop someone from surreptitiously flying it into the backyard of a celebrity's house in the hope of capturing scandalous footage? These are all legitimate questions for sure. But is the answer making it illegal for anyone (no matter the purpose) to use such technology? Should we be regulating potential, or behavior? These are questions for politicians, philosophers, pundits, and registered voters.
There is one thing for sure: for every purpose that a drone could potentially have, there is an opinion. 
Ty Audronis is an editor, special effects guru, and consultant for studio technology. He has flown his multicopters and fixed-wing drones for several network shows, ads, and films. His drones’ current status: grounded.
DJI Response
Interview with Kate Blaising at DJI Innovations (a leader in private drone guidance systems, and the manufacturer of the Phantom quadcopter camera system):
Are you active in the legislation process regarding private drones?
“We are indeed active all aspects of assisting governmental bodies develop regulations for UAS use. We were recently very active in working directly with the Texas Legislature to help develop wording for bill 912 that passed through both the House and Senate – it is a perfect example of how States should regulate UAS use.”
Some government agencies are concerned about mounting guns on small drones. Is this even a possibility?
“The physics of this is just outright funny. Simply put, there is no reason to be concerned about putting a gun on a personal UAS. In order to weaponize a drone, you would have to look at military-grade estions [drones that] cost hundreds of thousands of dollars.”



How to Make a

DIY Green Screen

Free eBook


How to Make a

DIY Green Screen


Thanks! We will email your free eBook.


  1. i'm glad there are no restriction flying hobby drones in Canada, for the time being, who knows if the government find a way to make money selling licences to fly drones, we will have to go by the rules.$$$$

  2. You can get an SFOC for legle operations in Canada. Other countries in Europe allow for legle commercial use. The U.S. is years behind in the airspace integration effort. If you want more info you can find me @ I'd be happy to discuss the laws and issues.   

  3. Thanks for the excellent information.  This is something I run into on almost every shoot and questions always arise.  This helps.

  4. Thanks for your comment.  I do have to say that the drones themselves draw a lot of attention.  During a shoot for "I Almost Got Away With It" (on Investigation Discovery), we had Oakland Police stopping every 5 minutes to check out shooting permits.  Luckilly, nobody knew about the FAA rules yet.  Now, just about every police department in the country has the memo.  I'm also an AMA member (Academy of Model Aeronautics), and there are reports all over the country of Police departments taking drones from hobbyists and "double checking" that they aren't invading privacy, nor flying where they shouldn't.  So, if you fly it… have a laptop handy to show any curious police officers the footage so they don't take it in for review.  I should say that nearly all of the reports of having drones confiscated have resulted in them being returned… but it can take days or even weeks.

  5. I'd like to know what the laws are from state to state. I often shoot stock footage and I had a copter that was basically in my shopping cart ready to be bought. Now, the uncertainty is making me wait. I'm actually surprised. I was looking at the Spreading Wings S800 which is for professional videographers. I can't believe this is the first I've heard of it. 


    I have to say that some of the worries of drones is a little dumb. Celebrities? Who cares. Bombs maybe but couldn't you already do that with RC cars/boats. Guns? Come on. They'd have to build a real helicopter with a targeting system. I could hit someone with my car but I'm allowed to drive it. What about the good things you could do? Find people in burning buildings, investigate structures, help police, whatever else. Hobbyists could serve the greater good if they were allowed to practice.


    I think they could make people register and get licenses. I'd be cool with that. 

  6. There was recently a very good webinar series presented by Parker Gyokeres of Propllerheads  via ASMP that covered a LOT of UAV ground.  The very first session addressed the legality issue featured an AMSP lawyer who is in the thick of the legal side of this issue. The lawyer agrees with a lot of what has been said here. Fly at your own risk, the FAA just doesn’t like this technology. 

    • There are good reasons they should not, as there are LOTS of amateurs flying in very unsafe ways which are covered in this thread

    • You have heard that the FAA is handing out $10K fines left and right.  The reality is that it was ONE fine, and that the court ruled against the FAA saying in short, that the FAA does not have the authority to levy fines against activities for which there are no laws just because they don’t like the activity. 

    The FAA has, if I understand correctly, only very recently (within the past few weeks) submitted PROPOSED regulations which are at this time not law.  I am at this moment waiting for a heavy lift Octo so have also invested heavily.  

    I believe that the FAA would like nothing more than to have us all panic and end an industry.  As for me and my company, we will operate in the safest possible manner and carry on in a manner that the FAA would be glad to hold up as a case study in legal flying. 

    Keep calm and fly on.



  8. Very good feedback.  Since the time of this article, the FAA has handed out 6 permits for UAS cinematic production.  So, the precident is set.  The way to file your exeption is called a "333".  It's relatively easy to do, but time consuming.  I do suggest picking up UAS insurance.  (My S900 is insured for $500,000 worth of liability for $595 per year).

  9. For R/C hobbyists such as myself, what you refer to as drones (which by definition are military aircraft) are really called QUADCOPTERS… For some reason I have noticed that videographers and photographers keep throwing around the term drone. As mentioned that term is incorrect. Second it has damning connotations for a radio controlled vehicles that makes people faslely believe them to be evil. So please stop using the "slang" term and start calling them what they are, QUADCOPTERS. Lastly, we need to squash any attepted laws or regulations limiting our freedom to fly an R/C toy around. They are not doing any harm to anyone especially if people follow the safety guide lines that have already been in place for decades reagrding safe R/C aircraft flight… 

  10. I agree with the "Drone" moniker.  Very few, if any of or DIY UAV's have Hellfire missles instaled, much less armed.  Unfortunately, trying to correct the grammar of an official who has the ability, if not the authority, to shut down your shoot, may not be the best way to go.  And most people know them as drones.  And there are octocopters as well so….


    If you look closely at many of the state laws, be they real, or proposed, I am unaware of any that shut down flight.  What I have read deal specifically with surveillance (stalking)

  11. On YouTube, there is a filmmaker by the name Tom Antos. He has produced a couple of drone aerial films, one called "Sky's the Limit" using the UAV mentioned in this article. He is re-engineering the UAV and hopes to produce a turnkey shoot-out-of-the-box system. Check out his channel:


    Wind the video back to see the entire clip, but I wanted wedding videographers to see the clip starting at 2:02. Imagine what the bride and groom will think when it's legal to do this!

  12. This article was linked in an email I received today (Aug. 17, 2016). Why? Considering new FAA rules that went into effect recently, it is completely out of date. I would suggest a revision before Videomaker points its email subscribers to read it.

Comments are closed.