Most mistakes can be avoided with organization and preparation. This can be in the form of a written or mental checklist and the thoroughness to check your work. Some of these errors are easy mistakes that are part of the learning process and go away with time and experience. Some are the result of a deliberate action or lack thereof. While others seemingly land themselves in your lap and have to be dealt with regardless

Studio and Location Recording and Production Errors

Most mistakes are actions of omission, the act of failing to do something that causes issues down the line. When progressing through the learning stages of any discipline I find it useful to be extra mindful and to take notes of whenever you catch yourself making a mistake or deviating from an established best practice.


The first step is to understand your equipment. If you are entering a situation where equipment is being provided, it doesn’t hurt to read up on the specifications and to shed some light on any possible unknowns. I would say the same applies especially to your own gear. This kind of knowledge will make sure you use the right equipment for the job and avoid any nasty surprises.


8 Tips for Making a Stellar First Video

Free eBook


8 Tips for Making a Stellar First Video

Free eBook


Thank you! Your free eBook will be sent to you via email

Forgetting to arm a track for recording or to supply a microphone with phantom power are common newcomer mistakes and can have a massive effect on your production. 

Forgetting to arm a track for recording or to supply a microphone with phantom power are common newcomer mistakes and can have a massive effect on your production. There have also been cases of placing a front address microphone in reverse. Learn what the results of these mistakes are ahead of time by taking a moment and finding out. An unarmed track will record silence, an unpowered microphone will either be silent or extremely quiet, and a reversed microphone will sound muffled and hollow.


Which leads us to the important practice of checking your levels and getting some test recordings or passes in before you commit to recording. Regardless of whether you are on set or in a studio, you should stop and double check everything is in order and that you are getting good sound. This is a great way of saving yourself the embarrassment and trouble caused by recording several amazing takes of silence.

Click Tracks and Comping

The mistake to avoid here is finding yourself with a project with multiple takes and inconsistent timing. The lesson to learn is to not deny yourself the tools that can benefit your work.

If you feel that recording to a click is the better course of action, you should probably take it. Some musicians consider click tracks offensive or that they somehow detract from the purity of their sound. In fact, musicians are advised to make a habit of practicing to a metronome. There is absolutely nothing wrong with using click tracks and it only opens more doors down the road.

Comping is the digital process of recording multiple passes and scrubbing between them to mix and patch elements from different takes. Using a click track is strongly recommended since it allows for the takes to line up. The analogue equivalent was to splice multiple pieces of tape together. Comping is far more accurate since we can get down to the sample level during editing. This works well for both music and dialogue.

These tools not only help to produce cleaner takes but also contribute to the creative process by creating new possibilities that the musicians can go back and recreate. I have comped new drum takes that drummers have liked so much that they have re-recorded songs based on the comp.

Track Substitution

I was handed a mixing project where bottom snare track was not armed during the final takes. The band was not recording to a click track so that ruled out comping. So, was it going to kill the take? No, not quite, but it would have been nice to have. Otherwise there wouldn’t have been a microphone there. The elaborate cover up was to clone the existing top snare track and to EQ it in a way that makes for convincing bottom snare sound. In this case we wanted more of the punchy low end and the snap of the snares. Add some compression and we had ourselves a fully rounded snare sound again.

Mixing and Post Production

Not all projects are created equal or by the same person. Sometimes a mistake was made and missed, other times an idea occurred after the fact. Mixing can help clean up mistakes, polish what is already there, and serve as a foundation that expands on what is already there.

Adding Performances

Other mistakes are not so much errors as they are missed opportunities. Sometimes when you pick up an existing mixing project you can come across places where the arrangement can benefit from a few small changes. These situations are served well by having a look through the song or other takes for passages that come close to what you are hearing in your head. From there you can copy the tracks over and gently massage them in with some careful editing to the lengths and timing. Crossfades are useful in minimizing the effect of overlaps. Use your ears as to judge whether the resulting edits feel natural.

I feel inclined to also include overdubs and additional recording in this category. In the case of film dialogue it’s good to establish early on when and where ADR will be required because of lacking location sound. In music terms you might decide that you need some more backing vocals, additional guitar, or extra percussion. Depending on the budget, schedule, and situation you might use sampled instruments, guest musicians, and performers. I have been in ADR sessions where the original talent’s voice was entirely replaced all together due to scheduling conflicts.

Film Sound

A great rule of thumb is to always record at least a minute or two of background noise when recording sound on location. This will be an indispensable tool in your inventory when you inevitably have to match ADR with on-set dialogue. Use your EQ to add and subtract frequencies in order to match the distance of your source. The low end rolls off as the subject gets farther away from the microphone.

Matching sounds can be done by using an EQ with an analyzer and selecting a high resolution, after that it is a matter of using your hearing and getting the sound as close as you can. Blue Cat Audio offers a free frequency analyzer VST, RTAS, and AU plugin. Logic Pro includes one on its default EQ. A paid alternative is available through iZotope’s RX 4 Advanced that brings a host of features that include level and EQ matching, as well as reverb reduction.

I hope you enjoyed the review of common mistakes and solutions. Who knows, maybe you even had a chance to think back on your early days in the sound game. As mentioned earlier, mistakes happen. The best you can do is to be prepared and experienced enough to gracefully overcome them and to learn from them.

Blag has a B.A. in Recording Arts from California State University Chico. He is a sound engineer and web developer with a love for music, video, and tinkering with cars and computers.

Blag spends his time between DevOps and audio. He works at a software company and is a contributing editor at Videomaker where he mainly focuses on, you guessed it, audio!


  1. The article contains some very good advice. I have one thing to add. We mostly have come to accept that the audio recorded by the internal microphones of most camcorders is fit only to be scrapped. I generally use an external mic. a small ‘Sennheiser’, but it has the disadvantage that having a narrow field of acceptance, it frequently pulls in sounds from behind my subject material and in line with it. Sometimes that is a bigger disadvantage than learning to live with the audio recorded by my camcorder’s internal mic.

    Under those circumstances, I uncouple the external mic and take my chances with the Omni-directional in-built mic. What it records is a ‘pilot’ for what I must do later. It contains all of the original noises. They may not be usable, but they are a record of the sounds which occurred at the location at-the-time and a useful reference for what ought, ideally, be used to replace them. So, when my material goes into the video editor’s timeline it is included for exactly that reason. When the time comes to dub-in (hopefully) matching audio from other sources, or times, the visible wave-forms are an excellent guide as to ‘matching’. Either track may be muted while reviewing the other and that makes dubbing in substitute material a great deal easier.

    My best shooting location has been chosen because it is ‘local’ and I am able to drive there in ten minutes to obtain substitute audio for video should it be needed. But it is also ‘urban’ and located in an area where recording clean and undisturbed sound is impossible, due to banging car doors, (there is a beach opposite which is a favourite spot for dog-walking), people hotting up cars, doing building repairs or yapping endlessly and pointlessly on cellular phones. It is a favourite spot for fly-overs by aero-club aircraft on fine days, and in a flight path of our local ‘Rescue Helicopter’; I think you get the picture. However, it is also a notable wild-life filming hot-spot.

    Apart from recording sound alone at unsociable hours, nothing much can be done. Even at 5am on a fine morning, dog-walkers are out in force, and there is much of the usual ‘noise’; it is just that it is taking place earlier in the day. I often wonder what the public reaction would be if it was the public at large which was being affected that way, rather than me; especially in view of the fact that the replacement of each ruined audio-take calls for an average of half-an-hour of rectification time, and in the end, may prove impossible to patch-up, in any case.

  2. Echoing Art’s comments, I agree that the article had a lot of good info but my projects (weddings, church & school events) are not as complex as he addresses. But I have found that keeping some of the audio from the internal camera mics to be very useful. As in my case, I would typically use 3 to 5 cameras for a wedding ceremony. One of the cameras would have a wireless feed from the groom, another the house or DJ feed and the others would catch the audio as is and I would use a digital recorder to make a safety net recording. When I originally edited using only the ‘clean” audio tracks I found them to be unnatural sounding and not have the feel of the event. I started using the internal mic audio from the other cameras to mix a small amount of the ambience of the overall venue to create a very listenable but live feel of the event (audience buzz, camera clicks, restless children). Most people who see the finished videos come to believe this is what they experienced but it is actually more listenable than they actually heard when they were at the event. I think the overall effect is worth the extra work to sort out the layers of audio that end up in the final track.

Comments are closed.