Archive for the ‘Online Video’ Category

Take a Fun Quiz to Find your Video Style

by Mike Rosen | April 12th, 2012
    What’s Your Video Style? Take this quiz for fun and see what style of video best suits your personality. Agree or disagree with your results? Tell us why below!

1) What’s your Favorite thing about putting together a video?

A) I like working in a nice quiet studio, where I can devote all my attention to my work.

B) I like working with video tools and equipment. I’m a real hardware fanatic!

C) I like working with people. They fascinate me!

D) I like creating an ambiance, something that will really draw the audience into the movie!

E) I like the action. I’m not happy unless I’m in the center of the storm!

F) I like the chance to be creative, to experiment with new ideas!

2) What’s the most important thing you look for when you watch a video?

A) I look to see how well it’s technically put together. I appreciate good craftsmanship.

B) It has to look good! People aren’t going to watch it if it looks like it was made by amateurs.

C) I like a good story, something to really make me care about the people on the screen.

D) A good soundtrack! A movie is boring if it doesn’t have a some tunes!

E) I want to see real people in real situations! I want to see how things really happened.

F) Did it teach me something new? I always want to add to my knowledge!

3) If you could pick anyplace in the world to shoot a video, would you choose to shoot:

A) The Great Barrier Reef in Australia?

B) The Roman Catacombs in Italy?

C) The Great Pyramids of Egypt?

D) The Oktoberfest Celebration in Germany?

E) The Running of the Bulls in Spain?
F) Bodie Ghost Town in California?

4) How would you describe yourself?

A) Meticulous and Logical!

B) Dark and Mysterious!

C) An Avid Story-teller!

D) Epic, Bigger than Life!

E) A Romantic at Heart!
F) Curious and Restless!

5) What’s your Biggest Reward in Making Video?

A) The Satisfaction of a Job Well Done.

B) The Appreciation of an Audience

C) Making a difference in the way people see the world.

D) The Chance to do Something Challenging and Creative

E) Seeing People’s Faces when they see themselves in your video

F) Seeing your Work on the Big Screen.

If you answered mostly A, you are an EDITOR. Shooting video is fun, but you have a real appreciation for the craft and artistry that comes afterward. You know that every snip and splice has the potential to make a story come to life, and there’s nothing you like better than turning that raw footage into something compelling.

If you answered mostly B, you are a LIGHTING FANATIC. You know that a video isn’t worth anything if you can’t tell what’s going on in it. Your standards for lighting are strict and your videos benefit from your attention to detail. Whether it’s creating a noir atmosphere with shadows or illuminating an interview subject, you know that lighting is key to interesting, engrossing videos. You’re always up to meet the challenges that other videographers forget to prepare for.

If you answered mostly C, you are a DOCUMENTARIAN. You love story telling and you can find the story in anything. Whether it’s something as small and silly as a nature film about salamanders or as heart-felt and personal as a family biography, you’re aces at finding those telling moments that illustrate the big picture. You love exploring human drama and you’re not shy about capturing the best – and worst– with your camera.

If you answered mostly D, you are a SOUND FANATIC. You’re the person people turn to when they need to capture the soft sounds of birdsong or muffle out the interrupting din from the nearby highway, because you understand how important sound is. When you do your job right, the results are practically invisible. Audiences may not realize why they like your videos, that your perfectly-synced sound effects and carefully selected music are what’s pulling them in, but you know the secret. You’re always up to meet the challenges that other videographers forget to prepare for.

If you answered mostly E, you are an EVENT VIDEOGRAPHER. You’re a daredevil; you like being right in the middle of the action. You don’t shirk from a challenge and you’re not afraid to take on assignments where you only have one shot to get it right – weddings, celebrations, speeches, anything where there’s a vortex of activity, you’ll be there with your camera in hand. Action is your watchword!

If you answered mostly F, you are a JACK OF ALL TRADES. You’re always exploring, always searching for something new. You never accept that you’ve learned enough, and you’re always striving to improve your video-making skills. Your creativity and inquisitiveness show through in your videos, which are continuously changing and maturing.

For tips and tricks with all sorts of video, join Videomaker‘s  eNews electronic newsletter, chock full of the info and advice you crave, it’s just what you need to satisfy that nagging curiosity.

Brewery Corporate Video Shows Importance of B-Roll

by Mike Rosen | March 29th, 2012


When we find an interesting video project, we like to point it out to our readers. Videomaker’s Facebook friend Charlie Essers (@PushEject) recently shared a corporate video he made to help promote a new craft beer brewery in Los Angeles.  I thought this was a great example of the effective use of B-roll, so I wanted to share: Welcome to the Golden Road

You can see some excellent use of B-roll in this video, with shots of people enjoying the product are interspliced between interviews with the brewery founders. As you know, B-roll is essential for a number of reasons.  First, it helps break up the monotony caused by a series of talking head interviews.  There’s not much visual interest in watching people talk about the. Second, B-roll is useful for hiding cuts and splices.  Oftentimes, when you’re shooting an interview, your subject will ramble on or pepper their responses with “um”s and “you know”s.  Obviously, you’ll want to cut out the chaff to make a more compelling, dynamic interview.  But if you don’t have good B-roll to smooth over the transition, you’ll get something akin to Homer Simpson’s infamous interview on the fictional magazine show “Rock Bottom.”

Finally, in this video, you can see that the B-roll thematically fits the purpose of the video, promoting the Golden Road Brewery. If you haven’t shot enough B-roll before you start editing, you might be forced to fill the gaps with images that don’t help bolster your video’s point — for example, random crowd shots or street scenes. In this video, every second of B-roll helps to drive home the goal by showing happy customers using the product.  Fancy work!

How to Make a Viral Video? Make a Cute Cat Video

by Jennifer O'Rourke | March 16th, 2012

How to Make a Viral Video? Make a Cute Cat Video

Having a successful YouTube viral video is the dream of nearly every person who hits the upload button, but the fact of the matter is you might have a better chance of getting hit by the proverbial lightening bolt than having a successful viral video. (Remind me to tell you my lightening bolt story later.)

According to Most Watched Today, viral cat videos are one of the biggest group of videos people watch and share, as this “Catvertising“  commercial spoof tries to illustrate – as well as Kittywood, a spoof on a Hollywood-type production company that only makes cat videos.

Viral videos today are what catchy jingles and slogans were pre-internet. Remember “Where’s the Beef”? How about “Got Milk?” or “Don’t Leave Home Without It”. These particular slogans were so popular that they took on a life of their own and are still parodied today. Read the rest of this entry »

Panasonic’s “Shoot It/Share It” Contest Features the AG-AF100

by Richard Ober | March 12th, 2012

With entries in the categories of Short Film, Documentary, Commercial, Music Video, Nature & Wildlife, and Student Film, Panasonic’s “Shoot It/Share It” video contest has something for everyone.  At Videomaker we are always eager to share ways for both beginner and expert video producers to get their work acknowledged.

This year’s “Shoot It/Share It” contest invited videographers from around the world to shoot short videos of five minutes or less using the Panasonic AG-AF 100 camera. A panel of Panasonic pro video experts selected three finalists from each of the six categories. Now it’s up to the public to choose the winners in each category.  These first place winners will each receive a Vocas 0255-2000 Matte Box and rail system.  Panasonic will then select the grand prize winning video and that video producer will be awarded a 42” Panasonic TH-42BT300U Pro Plasma reference Monitor, a piece of hardware that any of us would love to employ in our post-production workflow.

The finalist videos are an eclectic bunch.  From short films about a couple preparing for a first date and why old people behave the way they do, to high-production value commercial videos, the work done by these videographers is at times light and whimsical and at other times intense and artistic.

In the Short Film category, the finalists include “Dropping the Question,” “First Date,” and “Old on Purpose.”

The Documentary films include “The Walking Gallery,” “Pizza Shop,” and “Maggies Place.”

Commercials include “Riviera Skateboards – Cody Coyote,” “Drops of Good – The Growhaus Renovation,” and “Artistry.”

The Music Video category features “Little Tybee – Boxcar Fair,” “I Won’t Try To Break Your Heart,” and “This Guy’s in Love with You.”

In Nature and Wildlife the finalists are “Dillon Falls on the Deschutes River” and “Botswana Safari.”

And in the Student Film category the choices are “HOLDUP,” “The Name to Remember,” and “Word.”

Again, all of these videos were shot on the AG-AF 100 and all work to show the camera’s versatility.  Videographers of all skill levels should check these videos out, whether to glean some inspiration, study some interesting techniques of lighting and editing, or simply to vote for your favorites.

The contest remains open for public voting through April 4th.  The highest vote-receivers will be named first place winners at the National Association of Broadcasters show in Las Vegas, NV in mid-April.  Videomaker will, as always, be at NAB to cover this Panasonic event as well as to scope out all the latest innovation the industry has to offer.  In the meantime, check these videos out and help select the winning entries.  It’s one more way for us to celebrate the great work being done in video these days.

We’re Living in a Golden Age of Video Production

by Mike Wilhelm | February 6th, 2012

We live in an age were most every family in America owns a video camera and editing software, even if they never sought out either. Anyone with an internet connection can put their video online where it can be seen by everyone on the planet. The web has given anyone who wants it, access to far more information than any film school alone can provide. The world of video production has entered a golden age. There are no more excuses not to pursue whatever goals you hope to achieve with video.

In the late ’90s, when the average middle-class American could purchase video editing software to run on the home computer they already owned, it was clear that we were entering a new era of video production. Consumer camcorders were already common, but with non-linear editors entering people’s homes, so too, was a quality of production reserved only for professionals or those willing to spend thousands on uni-tasking equipment.

Consumer video production stayed at that point for about 10 years, as individuals shot SD footage on their home camcorders and edited on their PC or Mac.  In the last few years, however, we’ve seen a surge forward in the process of consumer level video production. It’s a result of computers and cameras getting cheaper, and moving into every electronic device in the home.

When The Blair Witch Project came out, people were amazed that someone could shoot an entire film that would be released world wide, on a simple consumer camcorder. Today, an iPhone 4S could easily take better quality video and cost significantly less. The only reason, I believe, that we haven’t seen a nationally released film shot entirely on a smartphone yet is simply because an upgrade in picture quality and functionality can be purchased for under a thousand dollars.

It’s not just the cost of quality cameras and accessibility of editing software that is bringing good looking video to the masses, it’s also the size. It turns out that a fluid-head tripod capable of supporting a 3lb camcorder doesn’t cost a lot of money. The same can be said about slider dollies, jibs, and even stabilizers.

Of course some equipment is as pricey as it’s ever been. Lights and microphones, for example, don’t seem to be getting any cheaper, but we live in the age of the internet. It’s much easier to learn from others about how to build your own lighting rig, or even record studio quality ADR straight into your laptop or iPad.

Cameras and editing systems are getting cheaper by the day, and the free flow of information on the internet is making it easier than ever to break into video production. As a result, Hollywood is losing its hold on the film industry, which is a good thing for both consumers and producers of great video.

Four Fair Use Factors for Video

by Mike Rosen | February 2nd, 2012

Last week, we looked at what fair use ISN’T.  So now let’s look at what it is.

Basically, fair use depends on a few factors, most importantly (1) the amount of material you copy from the original work,  (2) your purpose in using that material, (3) the nature of the work that you’re copying, and (4) the effect that your copying has on the original art.

(1) The amount of material you copy from the original work –For the first factor, you are generally allowed to use snippets of a work as long as you don’t appropriate the “heart and soul” of the work…what, exactly, that means is open to some debate. As an example, if you grab a few seconds from another film, you’re probably in the clear. However, you would probably not get away with including the entirety of that film in your own project. How much is too much? That’s different in every case, so just try to exercise some common sense.

(2) Your purpose in using that material — Fair Use allows you to make use of a pre-existing artistic work for purposes of education, training, news reporting, scientific research, critique or commentary, or parody. Think of the last time you watched critic review a movie on television. It probably included a short clip from the movie being reviewed, right? Likewise, you might have been in a classroom lecture where the teacher will show video clips to illustrate some point or other. These are other examples of situations that are more likely to be deemed Fair Use.

(3) The nature of the work that you’re copying — Certain sorts of material are more likely to fall under the fair use exception – for example, clips from non-fiction works. We generally agree that it’s a good thing for the public to be well-informed on history, so would it be in the public interest for a historical video – like, say, the Zapruder film of President John F. Kennedy’s assassination – to be blocked from public view because someone claimed copyright ownership? (In fact, Time magazine did make such a claim after a history book used stills from the film as illustrations. They didn’t prevail.)

(4) The effect that copying has on the original art — Finally, let’s look at the effect on the original work. Remember that copyright law exists in theory so that an artist can profit from his own hard work without someone else undermining him. Thus your work can’t be so similar that people would start buying yours instead of the original. One sticking point for many is that fair use depends a lot on intentions and motivations. For example, let’s pretend that I wrote a parody song making fun of Lady Gaga’s latest song by changing the lyrics to be about cheeseburgers. It’s fine if people listen to my song and think, “Hey! This song makes a good point. Its sharp and biting satirical message has made me realize that Lady Gaga is a hack and I will henceforth refuse to purchase her music!” If Lady Gaga’s sales start to drop as a result, she can’t sue me because my ridicule was too effective. HOWEVER, I could get in trouble if people listen to my parody and think, “Hey! This song is pretty good! It’s pretty much like Lady Gaga, so instead of buying the original song from her, I’ll just buy this parody instead.” A parody work that hurts the original artist by becoming a substitute for their work will most likely not qualify for a fair use exception.

Again, acknowledging that you don’t own the original artistic work, giving credit to the original artist or using a work without any intention to profit will often encourage an original artist to let you use his work, but it does not necessarily mean that your work will fall under fair use.

If you really want to be sure you’re in the clear when it comes to copyright with your video project, you owe it to yourself to check out Videomaker’s Archival Storytelling book.  It breaks down all the elements of copyright, so that you’ll know exactly what you can get away with when you need to use footage from another person’s work.

Fair Use Misconceptions Can Expose Video to Copyright Violations

by Mike Rosen | January 26th, 2012

We frequently get questions from video creators about the rules for making use of other creators’ work in their own projects.

If a piece of art was created so long ago that its copyright has expired and it’s since fallen into the public domain, you’re free to make use of it any way that you want. (To learn more about using archival footage in your videos, check out our  informative Archival Storytelling book) But if a piece of art is still under copyright, you’ll want to make sure that you’re in the clear. Most U.S. Creators are aware of a legal doctrine here in the States called “fair use,” an exception to copyright law that lets you make use of copyrighted material for your own artistic purposes. Unfortunately, there’s a lot of confusion about exactly what constitutes fair use. Let’s try and clear up some of the misconceptions so you can better understand when you can incorporate others’ material into your videos.

(First, please be aware that nothing said by Videomaker should be construed as legal advice. If you’re really worried about your rights, you should consult an attorney or legal expert before you make any rash decisions.)

Here are some common misconceptions that we see from video creators:

“This counts as Fair Use because I gave credit to the original artist.” Giving credit where it’s due is always a best practice – and just good manners. However, giving credit does NOT instantly bestow fair use protection upon you. At best, a polite tip of the hat may encourage the original artist to allow you to use their work for free. But this is entirely up to the artist’s discretion. They don’t have to let you use their work just because you acknowledged that they are the original creator and, if they don’t like what you’ve done, they can still try to make you remove it.

“I’m not making any money off of this, so it must be fair use.” Again, whether or not you make money can be a consideration in fair use, but it is not dispositive. In fact, some fair use works can be sold for profit. The fact that you’re not profiting may again make the original artist more sympathetic to your case, but it doesn’t mean that you’re automatically covered by fair use.

“I found this original artwork on the Internet, so obviously it’s free for me to use.” Just because an artist places his or her work on the Internet does not mean that they are giving you carte blanche permission to use it as you will. The same copyright restrictions that apply offline still apply online.

Again, acknowledging that you don’t own the original artistic work, giving credit to the original artist or using a work without any intention to profit will often encourage an original artist to let you use his work, but it does not necessarily mean that your work will fall under fair use.

You’ll always want to make sure that you’ve got your rights protected when you put together a video project.  Besides Archival Storytelling, you can get more help in keeping your project legally in the clear with our Indie Film/Video Legal Documents DVD.

What are the Best Video Formats for Online Distribution?

by Mike Rosen | January 12th, 2012

How can you choose the best video format to make sure that people view and spread your work over the Internet? Find out with our new free guide, What’s the best video format for online distribution?

So you’ve just finished completing the world’s next blockbuster and you want to get your baby on the web fast. The most important preparation is choosing how to format it for the web. Our newest free report explains video formats for the beginning to intermediate user — what the different video formats are and which are the best video formats for web distribution.  You’ll learn the strengths and weaknesses of MOVs, AVIs, FLVs, WMVs, and MP4s, so you can make an informed choice when you decide how the online world will see your movie.

Whether it’s a question of finding the best compression for YouTube or choosing a format that allows your users to interact with the video, there is a video format out there for your exact purposes. Choosing the best video format for web distribution is absolutely vital for getting people to watch your videos on YouTube, Vimeo or other video sharing websites. We asked filmmaker/videographer Chelsey Grasso to decipher the mysteries of getting the best compression for YouTube and the web. Download this all new free report to have all the different video formats explained in plain English.  You’ll never have to worry about your format choices adversely affecting your finished productions again.

Learn:

  • Sharing Your Video Masterpiece with the World
  • Why Video Formats Are Important
  • Getting Down to Business: The Types of Video Formats
  • Common Mistakes in Choosing a Video Format
  • Tips for Selecting the Best Video Format in Any Situation
  • Video Formatting: Wrapping It Up
  • Additional Resources

Download your free report What’s the Best Video Format for Online Distribution?

One-Second Video: What Can Be Accomplished in a Second?

by Richard Ober | January 4th, 2012

“Today, everybody’s a filmmaker.”  That’s the message of director Wim Wenders (“Paris, Texas” and “Wings of Desire” among many other films, as well as music videos for U2 and The Talking Heads) as he introduces a new innovative video competition in partnership with the pen and watchmaker, MontBlanc. Launched in September, the competition, titled “The Beauty of a Second” is designed to celebrate the 190th anniversary of the invention of the Chronograph by Nicolas Rieussec, which was able to record time to an accuracy of one fifth of a second, quite a feat in 1821.

“One of the great things about cinema is how it makes us aware of time.  Each film consists of many brief moments of life that altogether create a unique and new space in time.”  If you’re familiar with the project, or if you’re paying close attention to the tile of the competition, you’ll realize that the emphasis here is definitely on “brief.”

The MontBlanc video competition is for films one second in length.  As Wenders eloquently points out, every video we shoot is a series of one-second moments.  But what if you as a videographer set out specifically to capture the perfect one-second on film?  Would it be a moment in nature?  The start of a smile on a child’s face?  A white shirt hanging to dry on a line?  How do you capture not only a beautiful moment, but perhaps even a compelling story in just one second?  Maybe it’s not possible, but that’s precisely the goal of this competition.  And from the entries so far, it looks like many videographers are capturing great moments in very small cuts (or, more precisely, in very precise edits).

Since the competition opened, the first three submission timeframes, or “rounds,” have been completed.  As of this writing, we’re mid way through round four.  The final round will finish on February 12th.  At the conclusion of the contest, Wim Wenders will select the winning one-second film.  Once you’ve viewed a few dozen of the one-second clips, you’ll likely agree that choosing a winner seems like an impossible task.  Just how good can one second of footage be?

But the hosts of the website, “The Beauty of a Second,” provide an additional incentive for film makers and film buffs alike to join the fun. Even if you haven’t submitted your one second entry, you can assemble your favorite one-second films into a “Playlist,” thus editing together a film of up to sixty seconds, comprising sixty segments.

In our Videomaker blogs and forums we’ve talked frequently about outlets for creative videography and film making.  We’ve even reviewed the history of continuous shot films that can last as long as  eight hours.  This film contest from MontBlanc is clearly at the other extreme.

But MontBlanc is not the only outfit with a focus on the one-second film.

“The 1 Second Film” is a non-profit organization that has already produced what they describe as “the world’s biggest shortest film.”  The concept here is to produce a one-second animated film where each two frames of animation is comprised of a single collaborative painting.  (Actually, the twelve paintings that compose the animated film were produced at a kick-off party years ago.)  The one-second film will then be followed by a one hour credit roll, during which a “making of” documentary will run while all the contributors (the “producers”) to the non-profit will be listed.  The project’s beneficiary is The Global Fund for Women.  Producers, who have contributed everything from a few dollars to tens of thousands, include everyone from celebrities (Kevin Bacon, Steven Colbert, Kiefer Sutherland, and many more) to corporations (Apple, FotoKem, and others).

These two projects have a couple of things in common.  First, participants share a love of visual arts and experimental video.  Second, both projects are profoundly rooted in a sense of collaboration.  Both are worth paying attention to in 2012.

“Today, everybody’s a filmmaker.”  That’s the message of director Wim Wenders (“Paris, Texas” and “Wings of Desire” among many other films, as well as music videos for U2 and The Talking Heads) as he introduces a new innovative video competition

Awards from the IAWTV for Presentation at CES 2012

by Jackson Wong | December 15th, 2011

The nominees are out for the first International Academy of Web Television (IAWTV) awards. Final voting for the awards begins today and will continue up to Jan. 5, then, the winners will be announced on Thursday, Jan. 12 at the 2012 International CES. There is a great host of categories including live or taped shows, individual performances and many with a separate comedy or drama distinction. What makes these awards stand out are a few unique categories: Best Supplemental Content, Best Distribution Platform, and Visionary Award.

I’m a huge fan of special features and bonus content, so awards for supplemental content are great, especially since the web allows for a lot of creativity with such bonuses. The distribution platforms for Web video are incredibly important since it is an area where innovation will be quickly noticed by the general audience and advertisers and marketers have been looking for years for the best way to do business with the Internet. The Visionary Award is really the heart of the IAWTV and shows their value of advancing web television.

What’s Trending with Shira Lazar is both a nominee and responsible for hosting the presentation of the awards. There is a lot of great video to be seen gathered here at these awards, including the long running machinima Red vs. Blue.

The IAWTV is a nonprofit organization that focuses on the education and appreciation for Web video and it is open for new members to join. Anyone is welcome, and with these inaugural awards there’s sure to be many more that join the academy.

Take a look at the nominees and you should be able to find something worth watching, and who knows, maybe you’ll be ready to participate in future award ceremonies. I for one, am looking forward to checking out a few of the hundreds of nominees and reporting the winners of this year’s awards.

You are currently browsing the archives for the Online Video category.