Archive for the ‘Entertainment’ Category

Back to the Future 4? Do We Want to go Back with a Sequel?

by Jennifer O'Rourke | February 10th, 2012

In 1985, Marty McFly [Michael J. Fox] and Doc Brown [Christopher Lloyd] went back in time to 1955 then forward in time to 2015 and then farther back in time to 1885 through the 3-part Back to the Future trilogy. I’m a great fan of the trilogy,  and I love to watch the entire series with the director’s  commentary that explains how a lot of shots were done. But a Back to the Future 4? What do you think? Should they make a sequel?

Rumors? Or Fact?

Rumors of a Back to the Future 4 have been flying around for years, but as we approach Marty and Doc’s 2015 ‘future’, people are resurrecting a Back to the Future 4 idea. A couple years ago, on the 25th anniversary of the first BTTF movie, a Blu-ray edition of the trilogy was  released, causing a new flurry. And no wonder, the original Back to the Future stood 8 weeks in the number one spot in 1985 and was the highest grossing film of that year. Plus, the sequels did equally well – a rarity in sequel-dom.

This being 2012, the year of the end of the Mayan calendar that has triggered apocalyptic predictions of the end of the world, might also be triggering some Back to the Future 4 ideas.

Personally, I don’t think it’s a good idea. Michael J. Fox is clearly no teenager anymore and has chosen not to continue an acting career, and although some rumors have stated that the BTTF4 movies would have Doc Brown with a new side-kick, I think it’s a bad idea; you just don’t touch a classic. To make a sequel this late in the game will bomb at the box office, I’m sure. Remember The Sting 2? What about Staying Alive, the sequel to Saturday Night Fever? Or one of the biggest sequel jokes: Scarlett a 6-hourTV mini-series about Scarlett O’Hara and Rhett Butler following the events after Gone With The Wind. That was downright embarrassing. Help me with this – what other Sequel Flops do you recall?

Re-Makes: Love ‘em or Hate ‘em?

Most classics should be left alone, but technological advances in the movie industry have allowed movie creators to make some amazing realistic scenes using special effects that weren’t even a concept way back when. Sometimes a remake of a classic can introduce a new generation to the story, or make the story so much more realistic.  Planet of the Apes is one such re-makes that come to mind. Not only did Rise of the Planet of the Apes explain how apes really could take over the world in a few generations better than the first series; the reality of the chimpanzee – Caesar - played magnificently by the amazing Andy Serkis of Gollum [Lord of the Rings] fame, was unmatched compared to humans in monkey suits of the original 1968-’70s-era series. But these well-produced remakes and sequels are rare successes. the 2001 attempt at a Planet of the Apes remake bombed. Usually a remake or late-hour sequel seems to be someone’s attempt at making a few bucks on the unsuspecting public. [Pirates of the Caribbean 4, anyone?]

What sequels do you recall that were good, not just in how they were made but in how they continue the story, maybe merging storyline seamlessly?

Just for Fun Editing

What i DO like, though, is watching some of the “Mash Up” trailers that many people have been making, just for fun, about what they envision Back to the Future 4 might involve. From well-produced trailers showing Marty and Doc in prehistoric times and messing with the “Time Continuum” to cheesy low-quality trailers that have mixed BTTF footage with that from The Terminator, Juristic Park or other futuristic or prehistoric movies, these “Fake Movie Trailer” editors are having fun doing what we all love – editing.

So what do you think – Back to the Future 4? While we have the technology to make some awesome effects now, it would have to be one heck of a cast and the producing and directing needs to be spot-on, or else it’ll get subjected to the same criticism of the prequels of Star Wars – The Phantom Menace, which is now being re-released in 3D – anyone going?  I know I will – I am, after all, a Star Wars fan, even though I didn’t like how the prequels were presented – the joviality and spark just weren’t the same.

I say: Leave the Classics alone! Tell me, what do YOU think? And tell us, what’s on your “Worst Sequel List“?

Inaugural IAWTV Awards at CES 2012

by Jackson Wong | January 26th, 2012

Awards at the International CES 2012 abounded with the first ever International Academy of Web Television awards. Clips represented 16 different countries and come from some of the best online content available, exemplifying the web’s strength – content that viewer’s can’t get anywhere else. Among the IAWTV awards presented at the International CES 2012, The Guild, The Mercury Men and What’s Trending with Shira Lazar each took multiple trophies.

There is lots of other great content to be seen here, and what better way to find it than the best distribution platform: Blip.tv - this website brings many of the winners into one place. You’re sure to find something entertaining, and if not, at least worth sharing. There are hours to be spent watching the best hosted live web series, What’s Trending with Shira Lazar or laughing with the best comedy web series The Guild. If you like special features, the best supplemental content belongs to The Mercury Men. Mercury Men Pictures presents you with lots of extras including behind the scenes with visual effects, props, even retro trading cards. The quality of the content is unmistakably resemblant of online video.

The voting members had a tough job of sifting through such original content and coming out with decisions on 33 awards, including 9 categories for web series.  Two weeks to the day, the live broadcast from Las Vegas aired on their special site, and though the broadcast appears to be a first attempt at live view into an awards ceremony… that’s what it is. The waiting time for the broadcast treated viewers to clips from many of the nominees, and during the show, what really shines are the samples of web television. The content is sometimes shocking since there are fewer guidelines for these producers to follow, so plan accordingly for things such as language and a tampon reference.

With many of the categories including series, expect audiences to expand in number and some series to land on cable networks. Next year’s IAWTV awards are sure to be even more exciting, and maybe some of our readers will join the ceremonies.

16th Annual Webby Awards – Entries Being Accepted

by Richard Ober | October 12th, 2011

2011 marks the 16thyear for the Webby Awards and the this year’s entry deadline is October 28th. There are many good reasons for making short films, music videos, documentary shorts, animated movies, etc: love of the craft, fascination with the ever-evolving technology, professional endeavors, and “having something to do on the weekends” are among the many motivating factors Videomaker readers often mention. While only a handful of videographers are likely to admit it, fame and fortune should probably be added to the list.

From their relatively humble beginnings in 1996, when the web was still young, the WebbyAwards has obviously grown to be a major player in championing both mainstream commercially driven work on the internet and innovative, highly creative websites, interactive media, and mobile apps. As the Webby website states, the “Webbys are presented by The International Academy of Digital Arts and Sciences, which includes an Executive 750-member body of leading Web experts, business figures, luminaries, visionaries and creative celebrities, and Associate Members who are former Webby Award Winners and Nominees and other Internet professionals.”

Are you considering submitting an entry? While the $150/275 entry fee is a hefty price to pay, the exposure to peers and to a worldwide audience is clearly worth the investment to many. To learn more about entering, visit the Webby Award website.

In the Online Film and Video category, the Webby Awards has a fairly rich and varied catalog of winners. Last year’s winners include “The World’s Smallest Stop-motion Character Animation,” “Rated Awesome,” and “Ode to a Post-It Note.” (“The Johnny Cash Project” which we’ve blogged about here recently, was also a 2011 winner.) But possibly the most intriguing and innovative winner from last year’s Webby winners in the Online Film and Video category is “Welcome to Pine Point.”  This video/photography/interactive documentary about what happens when an entire town is built and dismantled in a single generation, is an absolute must-see.

So it’s time again for the Webby’s to solicit submittals. If you’re planning to enter, let us know. And then we’ll watch for your achievement to be celebrated.

Check out this Great Video “The Super List” – Nicely Done

by Jennifer O'Rourke | September 22nd, 2011

Every once in a while a well-produced video comes our way that we want to share with our readers. The Super List is one such project – it’s a great video and all the more fascinating because it is the producer’s first feature.

Will Gallego attended a Videomaker workshop a few years ago, and has been an avid reader of Videomaker, and recently sent us this video for a look-see. You HAVE to check it out, it’s pretty amazing:

THE SUPER LIST from Will Gallego on Vimeo

About the Producer
Gallego began shooting at 9-years-old on Super 8 film, but went on to make a career in other ventures after college. He returned to his movie creating passion six years ago when he had a brand new subject to follow: a baby girl.

He moved on to be the event videographer for a couple of theater companies, and eventually created his own company, Gamma Ray Productions with Raymond Vargas to produce “the Super List”, as a way to ‘prove’ the up-and-coming Gamma Ray Productions could deliver a quality movie, gain some valuable film experience and give everyone involved a chance to showcase their talent, which he hopes to enter into a short film contest someday.

About the Cast and Crew
It took eight months to complete, and was done in everyone’s spare time – no one was paid, including the actors but a few had some materials or travel expenses covered. 36 people in all worked on different parts of the production.

Writer Adam Winston and his partner and 3rd producer Frank Gallego (Will’s brother) were looking for a CGI story to pitch to Dreamworks. They knew of Will Gallego’s wedding video and music video work, and asked him to assist. Gallego writes, “I envisioned this as a live-action movie the instant I read the short screenplay.  From a practical standpoint, this was not a monumental task as far as logistics, cost and location. Once Dreamworks passed on the story, I let them know if they wanted to collaborate on a project, this story was just right.”

Based on Winston’s script concept, Frank Gallego hired a Hollywood artist to deliver the well-done and professional looking comic-book and ‘super list’.

Will Gallego’s role was as one of three producers, and also as Director of Photography and 2nd Unit Director. They shot in the autumn, to take advantage of the east coast’s amazing Fall colors, and shot in several locations from Eastern Pennsylvania to New Jersey. the soundtrack was composed by Will Gallego’s brother, William Gallego, and the two main actors, Derek and Ryan, are neighbors of Gallego, and Sarah is the director’s daughter. Each had some stage experience, but this was their first time on a movie set.

About the Gear
Gallego’s gear list for the shoot include:
Camera: Canon 5D Mark II.
Canon Lenses: 50mm 1.4, 24-70L 2.8 and 70-200L 2.8.
Soundtrack: Original music score by composer William Gallego was created with Apple Logic.
Audio/Sound Effects: Zoom H4n.
Entire Audio was mixed with Nuendo software.
Anders Johansson/Sound Editor took care of all the Foley and sound effects.
Cranes/Dollies: Losmandy Porta-Jib, Glidetrack
I rent whenever possible, such as the jib and some lighting equipment(flags, extra c-stands, follow focus, matte box. )
Editing: Final Cut Pro 7.  Trained in Apple One to One. Final Cut Pro 7, Motion and Photoshop Extended.
Other:  Marshall LCD70XP – 7 inch monitor, Zacuto follow focus kit, Petroff Matte Box with ND filters(a must for out door shooting if you want to open up the iris. [and he adds, "And of course, a lot of Videomaker reading and attending their 2 day workshop in Newark, NJ around 4 years ago. " How nice to be credited with helping him find his muse!]

Words from the Producer
“I owe theater director, Ted Concepcion and Jesse Gallego a lot of credit for giving me the first video job opportunity.

“Videomaker has been a great resource for me as a filmmaker.  I studied film theory in Rutgers University, but other than being a NYC film studio production assistant during my college years, I did not have much other film experience or any contacts to work with in NJ for 10 years as I chose a different career path. Luckily, I came across Videomaker magazine and subscribed. VM is a source of inspiration, especially, Mathew York’s Viewfinder section each month.

“There is an important message in this movie [that] Ray Vargas/Gamma Ray Productions values, and is forging forward with, mainly about the choices and decisions that kids/young people make at this point in their lives.  Ray feels in an anti-bullying campaign, the decision our main protagonist makes, which we don’t know for sure, is critical.  Just Be Me Organization is interested in this movie as a vehicle for discussion in anti-bullying campaign.  Kudos to Ray.

“If I could give any advice to new filmmakers, go and shoot something, but know what you are getting in to, know the end game. Everyone has to commit to the project no matter how small a role.  A movie is a complete production package: story, sounds, score, and cinematography.  If anyone tells you otherwise, tell them to write a book. Filming is like a muscle the more you exercise it the stronger you get.  No matter your role is in the movie, give it 110%.  Value your crew’s time and efforts by rewarding them with a finished project they can showcase.  This is their reel as much as the rest of the producers.  Don’t wait.  Set deadlines, deliver and move forward on your path.  Your crew will respect you for it and will be read to go make another one.  I am grateful I have a dependable crew that gives it 110%.

“In closing, I love one of your moderators’ feedback on your forum for the film.  He gave excellent constructive feedback, but on top of that, he says: “now go make another one…”  That is the true spirit of Videomaker: great advice and encouragement.  Thank you Videomaker.”

You’re welcome, Will, keep up the good work, and keep us informed.

Besides our well-known monthly magazine and website, Videomaker has many resources for learning for different types of needs from our face-to-face workshops like the one Will attended, to our training DVDs, books, eDocs and webinars. Our mission to to teach and encourage video producers to make their dreams come true – kudos to Will and his gang for keeping their focus strong and their dream alive, good luck to all of our readers who strive to make a project as entertaining and compelling as “The Super List.”

Collaborating on Video – Find Inspiration from TED Talks

by Richard Ober | September 15th, 2011

On-line sources for video content of all sorts, from artistic to instructional to experimental, are multiplying at a dizzying pace. Video collaboration, particularly collaboration “in the cloud,” is a quickly maturing concept.  And behind these sites for online video collaboration is the basic motivation for film makers and graphic artists to find new muses and wider audiences. Clearly there is no shortage of inspiration for those of us who are as passionate about video as we are about music, art, science, technology, and more. One of my favorite sources for such inspiration is the exceptional TED.com.

TED talks have been around for a long time now and many of us are in the habit of regularly visiting TED.com to check out the latest on-line releases. On a recent web surfing excursion to TED, I came across an extraordinary piece featuring an exhilarating example of collaborative on-line video editing. (Videomaker has blogged on this topic recently: see Daniel Bruns’ excellent blog posted August 8th on the phenomenon of leveraging HTML5 for music video production by bands like OK Go, Arcade Fire, and Danger Mouse.) Some of you are likely very familiar with Aaron Koblin’s work. Koblin’s TED talk, “Artfully Envisioning Our Humanity” posted this past May is a marvel.  If you haven’t already, you really need to check out Koblin’s TED talk.

Koblin has built an online environment wherein artists and videographers can contribute to a collaborative video featuring the late Johnny Cash’s final recording Aint No Grave (Can Hold My Body Down). It’s an astute choice, not only because this is a wonderful version of this song about living on through one’s legacy. Cash has been missed by many of us since his death in 2003. Koblin’s choice of Aint No Grave is also astute because there is no “holding down” the creativity of the still image contributors building a video and embracing Koblin’s site and his vision. As more and more images are added to the montage, it is clear that this site is tapping into both profound reverence for the artist (Johnny Cash) and into an enthusiasm for collaboration in video. The very nature of this project means that there is really never an “end-product” or a finished video, but rather iterative experiences that change with nearly every viewing, as long as the contributions keep coming and the video keeps evolving. Collaborative endeavors such as these inspire us to return again and again, to both add to and to admire the outcome. If you haven’t already, you really should check it out. (Visit The Johnny Cash Project.)

Many video producers toil to perfect their craft in simple DIY studios at home, or in temporary rented space, or simply out in the world with their camcorder in their hand. Unless you’re working closely with a cadre of fellow practitioners of the video craft (which luckily, many of you are), the work of video is usually less an act of collaboration and more often a solitary enterprise. You often shoot alone, edit alone, and release your video alone, hoping to capture a wider audience as your videos catch on via YouTube or Vimeo or elsewhere. But projects such as Aaron Koblin’s remind us that we can do amazingly creative things when we work together.

I want my MTV – 30 Years of Music Videos and More

by Jennifer O'Rourke | August 11th, 2011

I want my MTV

Anyone over the age of 40 can probably still recall that moment when they saw a music video on TV for the first time – it was magical, mesmerizing and enthralling. I remember walking into a friend’s house that had that new-fangled “Cable TV” hooked up and she said, “Check this out, it’s called MTV”. It was hypnotic – and we sat for what felt like hours watching without talking.

MTV,  the music video channel that literally changed the “look” of music, was launched 30 years ago this month with, appropriately enough, the music video, “Video Killed the Radio Star”, by the British New-Wave band, The Buggles.

When MTV first went on the air on August 1, 1981, it’s main purpose was to bring music videos to an eager audience. Previously, one couldn’t see a recording artist play except in live concerts, or on TV specials. Most musicians didn’t have, (or need or want) a “Music Video” and opponents to the show suggested that the music videos would kill the viewers’ desires to see the bands play in person. Being a new channel, and the fact that Cable TV was just a fiber-optic gleam in many a programmer’s eye, MTV wouldn’t catch on for a few years and only a small number of viewers in New Jersey actually saw that first video play. But as soon as “specialized” cable TV shows were available regionally, MTV’s “message” spread across the country like the proverbial wildfire – a new generation of musicologists was born.

Around that same time, as a college student at California State University, Fresno, I was enthralled at the idea of creating music videos. I was enrolled in the “brand new” major: Radio-TV Production, but there weren’t a lot of classes, choices or subjects to study at the time. One class I had, called “Careers in Media Arts and Entertainment”,  was supposed to expose us to all the different areas of study, but, in reality, all we did was research books on our own at the library and write essays every week on a different focus. Eager to learn more about making Music Videos, I devoured every periodical I could about MTV and music videos, (there were no making music videos books yet published, so my major reference “library” was Rolling Stone Magazine.)

I wanted to make Music Videos and I wrote in my essay: “A video editor has the chance to be creative beyond the norm and break the rules as an artist, not just as a cut-n-splice editor.” Dr. “M”, the instructor who lectured to us about “the Golden Days of Hollywood” but knew nothing about the current trends or popular culture, gave me a “D” for my essay – the only “D” I ever received at college level. He wrote: “MTV is just a fad, as is cable TV. No one is going to spend longer than 20 minutes watching that slop. You’re wasting your time and you missed the point of the assignment: to research a valid career that will sustain you in a worthy occupation.” I still have that essay – and I love to laugh at his words from time to time.

MTV DID sustain itself, for a very long time, despite being “a music video channel”, and a new business in the entertainment world came into being. The business of creating music videos became a lucrative career for many film and video producers including  John Landis who produced Michael Jackson’s famous “Thriller” video and Spike Jonze.

Music video became big business after MTV’s launch. There’s not a band today that hasn’t made (or attempted to make) a music video. And in many ways, yes, the music video DID kill the radio star. Looks, eventually, along with dance routines and catchy videos and effects were just as important to a band’s success as the lyrics and tunes they played. If a VJ loved your video, you were gold. VJ – for Video Jockey, a play off the DJ-Disc Jockey phrase, was another career launched with music videos. The old joke about “a face for radio” wouldn’t hold anymore.

The beginnings of music videos actually goes back to the beginnings of “talkies” – movies that had sound, but the Music Video by itself for a recording artist didn’t become popular until the 1960s with choreographed videos for the Beatles 1964 movie “A Hard Days Night. Music videos evolved in the 1970s into programs such as PopClips, a TV show developed by Mike Mesmith, of The Monkees fame.

According to a report on wikipedia, MTV’s original music video taglines were “You’ll never look at music the same way again,” and “On cable. In stereo.” The early days of MTV were so “raw” that programming would often go black while a tape-op switched tapes in a VCR!

In 1996 MTV 2 was launched, an all music videos all the time channel. By then, MTV had changed a lot, music videos had become much more polished and had a purpose that supported the lyrics, rather than random “60’s-ish” floating spots and effects. MTV was now airing  “Real Life” shows with “The Real World”, credited with starting the “Reality TV” genre, and “Road Rules”, along with a half-hour news segment. By then I was working for network TV and I remember a poll taken by our network sometime in the 1990s that found that a huge majority of young people reported that they got their news only from MTV’s “newsertainment” show.

courtesy: www.creativereview.co.uk/cr-blog/2010/february/mtv-refreshes-logo

MTV’s logo has also evolved over time, going from: “Music  Television” to just “MTV” since it eventually aired more than just music videos.  As an interesting fact, the original MTV man-on-the-moon image with the MTV logo pasted over the American flag  was created with dual purpose: to state that the channel was universal, but to also use Creative Commons and Public Domain images so they didn’t have to spend money creating or buying images for a show that might not make money.

Many former viewers of MTV lament the days of “all music all the time”, MTVs original mission, but for better or worse, the channel still thrives – and is doing well. Ironically, I have a friend in Hollywood who is my age who was up for a job editing a video for a pilot for a new soon-to-launch show. He was turned down with a sleazy excuse that they were looking for an “edgy funky non-traditional” type of editor, “you know, MTV-ish”. His frustrated reply: “Man, my generation INVENTED MTV!”

As for me, I did make a few music videos for local bands back then, I know of one band still using my video for their promotional website, and I created many “Video Essays” using popular songs wrapped around video of local festivities for the news stations I worked at that ran in the weather segments. My dream to actually work for MTV ended when a friend of mine, who worked for the network and was trying to get me a job there, died in one of the 9-11 planes that hit the Twin Towers in New York.

I cut my editing chops watching music videos, and learned about pacing, precise timing, and “how to break the rules” and I think the MTV of old helped me be a better video editor today. I want my MTV – still.

I love Lucy – 100 Years and Going Strong

by Jennifer O'Rourke | August 5th, 2011

Hollywood was putting on the Ritz this month, celebrating the 100th anniversary of the birth of Lucille Ball, the amazing iconic redhead of the longest syndicated-running show on television: I Love Lucy.  But Hollywood wasn’t alone, there were worldwide festivities celebrating the comedienne’s role “Lucy Ricardo“, as the  I Love Lucy show moves into 60 years of making viewers laugh.

Hard to believe that “Lucy Ricardo” could be 100, or that the show is six decades old, but generations have grown up watching the program, and to us, she will forever be immortalized as the 1950s era New York housewife, married to the Cuban band leader, Ricky Ricardo.

What was “just a show” to most viewers, to we video producers it was the program that launched the technical set-up and format to TV producing that many of us follow today. I Love Lucy was the first show recorded with a live audience, and it was also the first show to use 35mm film, instead of 16mm kinescope. The 35mm film was of a much higher quality which is one of the reasons we can still find I Love Lucy in syndication.

The builders of the  I Love Lucy show were also the first to design the recording studio in a classic 3-camera setup,  which is the design still in use today. Other firsts included using a large muted light grid, eliminating annoying and “false” shadows, giving an even tone and more natural look to the set. It was one of the first to feature a pregnancy into a show’s storyline.

CBS, the show’s original owner, had reservations about using Lucille Ball’s real-life husband,  Desi Arnaz, as a main character because he was Cuban, but Lucille Ball held strong to her demands.

Although people have heard of all the behind the scenes drama including Lucille Ball’s and Desi Arnez’s breakup, the two were quite the team, financing part of the show themselves, and were eventually able to buy the rights from CBS, creating Desilu Studios which controlled I Love Lucy and also brought many other popular shows under it’s wings including  The Andy Griffith Show, The Dick Van Dyke Show, My Three Sons,Star Trek, Mission: Impossible,  Family Affair,  The Untouchables, I Spy, That Girl, Make Room for Daddy and more and more and more.

Lucille Ball was born August 6, 1911, and I Love Lucy premiered on CBS on October 15, 1951 a few months after her 40th birthday. The I Love Lucy show has been running almost daily – somewhere – worldwide for the past 60 years.

The former “Ziegfeld Girl” dizzy comedienne was nothing like her TV alter-ego, she was tough, driven, and financially savvy enough to be the first woman to head a major studio after she bought out her husband’s share of Desilu Studios following their divorce.

Lucy’s character was so different than what we are forced to ‘relate’ to today: plastic “Stepford Wives” clones of every-other TV no-name ‘talent’ who will fade into nothingness the first season their show is no longer on the air.

Why – of all the TV shows that have come and gone, is this one still entertaining viewers: good writing, perfect comedic timing, and castmembers that knew their roles and played them well.   oh.. and it was one heck of a funny show. We should all be so lucky to produce such an iconic show that will live long after the physical TV set is no longer in every home in the world.

The Inside Experience: an Interactive Movie Going Experience

by Jennifer O'Rourke | July 26th, 2011

A thriller of a different flavor, “Inside Experience” offers social media participants to help move the plot of the story and decide the outcome of events. “Inside,” starring Emmy Rosseum, is an online thriller funded by Toshiba and Intel that debuted July 25th.

Have you ever wanted to get inside the head of a filmmaker or look behind the scenes as a movie unfolds? Have you ever wanted to decide a movie’s plot or a character’s fate while watching that movie develop? Here’s your chance to participate in a fully immersive movie experience.

Rosseum plays “Christina Perasso,” a young woman whose life takes a turn when she leaves a Seattle coffee shop and ends up in an unknown room with no outside contact. She has no idea how she got in this room – or why – but when she discovers her kidnappers left her a Toshiba Satellite P775 laptop, powered by an Intel second generation chip, she sets up Facebook, Twitter, YouTube and other accounts and starts trying to reach the outside.

Directed by D.J. Caruso, the laptop is a perfect idea as a tool for Rosseum’s character because it can also serve as her social media webcam, she uses it to show her viewers her surroundings and to also find clues and ask viewers to assist her to unravel these puzzles, in hopes of finding out more about her capture, surroundings, and (hopefully!) eventual escape.

Caruso says, “We wanted to make this an addictive experience for the viewer, … whether they’re watching the film segments or participating in the social media segments, the whole experience makes an entirely different film, so viewers or participants can help steer the film in a different direction.

Social Media Director Ben Tricklebank says, “it takes a traditional storytelling narrative, but tries to allow it to unfold through social media… and creating a story through those platforms.” Caruso adds, “it’s a little bit unnerving, but I mean that in an exciting way as a filmmaker.”

Fans can participate in several ways, through the site’s own blog, through the project’s Facebook page or through Twitter, by following @theinsideexp and the hashtag #theinsideexperience

Fans can post clues, offer poor Christina advice and support and some clues and ideas will be worked into the series episodes.

Definitely a different kind of thriller – one in which the viewer isn’t a passive watcher but an interactive participant. The new wave of movie going future or not, it’s a cool concept and – warning! Very addictive!

Videomaker Celebrates 25 Years with Live Streaming Party

by Jennifer O'Rourke | June 3rd, 2011

Last night Videomaker friends, family, staffers and alumni gathered for a festive event to celebrate 25 year’s of publishing tips, techniques and tutorials on making video – and we streamed it live to a worldwide audience.

When Matt and Patrice York first launched Videomaker magazine, there was no other publication like it that was targeted to the consumer video enthusiast. A few magazines existed for the professional producers, but nothing for the home video market. Matt’s vision was to create a warm, friendly environment where people interested in taking their home videos to a higher level by using better techniques and creative composition could ‘drop in’, ask questions, and not feel intimidated by the technology or snubbed by the elitists in the pro world.

Back then, video cameras were incredibly clunky, some still separated the camera from the recorder deck, and they were called “affordable video cameras for the consumer” for “only” $2,500 -  quite a bit of cash in the 1980s economy!

If you desired to edit your video – good luck! You had to have two VTRs, one to play your video out, the other to record your video to, and each time you dubbed footage down you had what they called ‘generational loss’, which was pretty bad in many cases because the original footage had poor quality to begin with, no real colors, poor contrast, and a complete loss of details in low light.

Then there was the problem of distribution. Once you had your footage shot and reasonably edited, you had to deliver it to your audience somehow, which usually meant dubbing it once again to a VHS tape and mailing it or hand-delivering it to someone.

Now everyone can upload their video to any number of free internet sites like YouTube and Vimeo, and anyone can stream their footage – live – via many sources and the quality is pretty good. Back in 1986, when Matt and Patrice launched Videomaker, only Broadcast TV stations had that ability, now we’re all broadcasters in our own right. And, believe it or not, we have Matt York and Videomaker to thank for some of the changes in the market through Matt’s personal contact with the manufacturers of the products you use and his battle at many levels to make video making no longer an elitist game, but an Every Person game. Congratulations, Videomaker, for 25 years. I’m glad to have been part of that history.

25 Years of Videomaker

Happy 25th Anniversary, Videomaker!

To help us celebrate 25 years of teaching video techniques, we created a forums page called “How Videomaker Helped Me”.  This link takes you to our 25th Anniversary “Letters to the Editors” page with comments and congratulations and you can read more or to add celebratory comments on our forums page.

DVD Extras offer Good Learning Tools

by Jennifer O'Rourke | May 27th, 2011

One of my favorite things about getting my hands on a new Hollywood release is the chance to check out the DVD Extras that some movies now come with. Especially now that many movies are released on Blu-ray, which can hold a lot more information and space than an ordinary DVD.

I love watching the Behind the Scenes footage (BTS), where they show the setup of some scenes. And the Director’s Commentary on most movies is very enlightening. After I’ve watched a movie from Open to End Credits, I watch it again with the commentary audio on.

If the comments are done by the director, sound person, director of photography or screenwriter, then there’s some good tidbits you can learn.

For instance, I was watching the original Star Wars trilogy, [yeah, we've had a lot of rain lately, so boredom does sink in!] but the “Bonus Disc” was stock full of BTS footage, setup, greenscreen, modeling, and comments on how they did it. The sound guys told a great story about getting the “right” sound for Darth Vadar’s footsteps from an old abandoned military bunker in San Francisco. You can read about some of it in our just uploaded Audio Column “Sound FX: Think Outside the Source

Besides the bunkers, they talked about using ordinary dumpsters to get great “outer space” noise – jumping inside a dumpster and banging on the walls. The level of “Junk” in the bin changes the feeling of the sound. (Hum – I just got an image of Luke, Han, and Leia falling down that garbage shoot!)

In the Back to the Future movies, (again with the trilogies!) the director talks about how they got  Michael J. Fox’s character in the third movie as an old time 1880s frontier man to hand over a baby to the 1980s Michael J. Fox character – both in a split scene at the same time – and the director used a quick “natural wipe” of Fox’s “mom” character passing through to bridge the gap. Really cool stuff.

Sometimes you learn how simple and easy a fix is, other times you realize how complex a problem solving issue was. In our recent Inspiring Directors feature, Director Ron Howard talks about how he had to work around location difficulties when filming Angels and Demons, his sequel to The da Vinci Code.  Yup – even big time directors have to fight City Hall sometimes.

I’ve found that some audio commentaries are lacking in any substance, for instance recently I was watching a movie with the main actor doing the commentary, and he invited the head chef of the catering department to assist. Most of the talk was about the food or silliness on the set. I’ve found that usually if the commentary is done by an actor, there’s not a lot of “learning” , they’re somewhat narcissistic and mostly talk about themselves.

I recently bought the HUGE 6-disc Blu-ray collection of the making of Avatar and it looks like yet another late spring storm might be headed our way, so I’m planning to hunker in and watch more “how to make a movie” tips on some DVD extras. Have a nice 3-day weekend, everyone!

You are currently browsing the archives for the Entertainment category.