Hey Craig
I'm under the impression that analog film and digital video are so different that at this point what is actually better may simply be a matter of taste. It seems to me that you assume that film cameras are the best. I'm not so sure about this. I think at this point, it more a matter of artistic judgement than anything else. The comparision between a movie camera and a DV camera has to be made on a cost basis. In other words, it would be easy to say film is better than DV, if you're comparing a $50,000 movie camera to a $2500 camcorder. The difference would be in the far superior optics and manual controls available to the more expensive camera. However, when you start making similar investments, digital cameras more than hold their own. Digital cameras are more suited for fast-moving, high-action shots and where sharp background focus might be needed. You can see this in HD TV, where the background and foreground seem to hold identical focus. If this is the future of motion imagery, then the eventual prevalence of digital movie cameras is assured.