hidef1080 Wrote:
One thing to think about if it matters to you is the V1U will give you better results in darker shooting situations.
One advantage of the larger sensor in this case.
Kevin Shaw Wrote:
hidef1080 Wrote:
One thing to think about if it matters to you is the V1U will give you better results in darker shooting situations.
One advantage of the larger sensor in this case.
Correction: it's the FX1 which has the larger sensors and hence better low-light response. Also note that a larger sensor gives you better depth of field control, which is something I noticed when I switched from my Canon GL1/GL2 (1/4" sensor) to the Sony FX1 (1/3" sensor).
Keep in mind that the cmos need a lot more light than CCD's and 1/4'' chips tend to make the image look slightly dim, but you would have to look at it closly to notice. Also keep
In mind that cmos are not new tecnology they have been around a while. It just comes down to waht you prefer.
We purchased a v1u a couple of months ago and CMOS is definitely less sensitive than CCD,
BUT the gain does not show noise until it's pretty high (around 9dB)
for us is a non issue since we use it mostly in studio, outdoor/daylight
or for stage shooting. On the other hand there are TONS of thing I love from this cam,
the image is pristine (we are shooting a show that airs on cable every month
and is done on green screen with virtual sets with Ultra 2 on DV).
You can save EVERITHING on 20 camera profiles on Memory Stick Duo and 2 on the camera itself.
The camera has so many configurable features that you NEED to use the profiles.
Assisted Focusing is premium (we were going to buy the JVC 110 just for that).
We are still working on SD but growing into HD with this camer sounds very attractive.
Hope it helps