Hi all,
New to the forum, and (relatively) new to videography. Looking forward to picking up what I can!
My question today is whether the client should or shouldn't be expected to enjoy the equipment rental discounts the videographer has cultivated.
I'll try to be specific with my situation: I was offered a gig recording a presentation out of town for a regular client. The client asked if would be renting a video camera - I am between cameras at the moment and said that I would be. They asked that I provide an approximate rental fee, and that they would require the details of the rental - i.e., a copy of the rental invoice.
My situation is that I have a contact who is willing to rent me the camera at 50% of the industry rate.
So, I thought this would be a good opportunity to learn a bit more about how the industry ticks.
1. Does the client generally speaking "enjoy" the discounts discovered by the videographer, or do they usually pay industry rates, even if the videographer has managed to rent the equipment more cheaply?
2. If it's the latter, how would you go about explaining this to the client? Or would you just look for a periodic rebate system from the rental contact? Is there any ethical question here?
3. Is the answer changed in this case because the equipment in question the utter basics (camera/tripod) that I would imagine usually come included in such a gig? Would the answer be different if it was a different piece of equipment?
4. So far, there has been no discussion with the client re: my fee, whether a single sum or hourly rate; I have worked for this client a few times and always give fair prices. Am I better off just passing on the discount, but factoring it in in some way with regard to my total fee?
Thanks so much for reading and for any thoughts or suggestions. I don't want to be unethical in my work, but I also want to be fair to myself.
NJ.







