Thank you cdanddvdpublisher.
Â
I feel that regardless of who's right or wrong, a second more serious wrong was done to the other viewers. (like having an argument at a party, ruins everones good time.)
I've skipped entire threads because of that, and so the original poster, and anybody else that might've benefitted, from the thread lose out.
thank you for the comment on the photo.
That shot is a good example of "Compression of Field" effect of telephoto lenses. at 200mm-400mm f22-f32, that little building behind the people gets pulled in close. Now if the camera had been set with a wide angle lens, (and moved in much closer to keep the people the same size in the frame), it would be readily apparent that the building is behind a road, beside an old pioneer fort, about two footbal fields behind the people. That same setup with a 4 stop nd and a polarisor stacked on it would open the lens up to about f4-f5.6 and that would give you the same field of view, with the subject having the same size in the frame, but with the background thrown completely out of focus.
I also shot video for them and made a photo/video montage on dvd for the clients. That gave me the added challenge of having to have my photos and video both matching in quality.
A white dog in a snowbank is about as tough a scene to expose for as you'll find anywhere!Â