I just finished the Tsunoda Wedding and it was a very nice wedding.
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Livingston-TN/Tasana-Studios/106794496057272
They also hired a photographer. Afterwards I was talking to some friends and was wondering something (we had another friend get married the exact same day in Wisconsin who did not hire either) With digital photo cameras getting as good as they are and software like Picasa is the wedding photographer going to soon be a thing of the past? Is the videographer going to be the way to go? This is why I ask. With the cameras today and even Picasa many can get photos good "enough" to put into an album or on the wall. In fact the "Aunt Joan" photos of today are on par with my wedding photos from 1988, and we paid handsomely. But video, well in doing the Tsunoda wedding I cracked open my NewBlue FX. Man did that push my computer to the max. A few times I thought I was going to throw a rod, and I have some serious hardware. So to get the effects that ones here are able to do is beyond the ability and cost of most. And in researching some of your videos here, you guys are good from what I have seen, most of America can't afford this hardware or software, and then there is artistic talent. And it seems that I am witnessing a change of thinking from ones wanting video. Tara (the bride in the wedding I just did) did not want a video. Yusuke came over with his M-I-L saw a complete wedding video I did, and that was it. I gave them a copy so he could show Tara. When I got to the wedding I had first run, even over the photographer. Also I was seated right next to the B&G table to ensure the best shots. Tara WANTED that video. I was stunned.
So what do you guys think? Will photos for the most part end up in the back and video in the front?
A Photo Captures but a Moment in Time:
Video Captures a Lifetime in a Moment







