So what I want to know is that if you guys think he is too young to start doing weddings?
I think it was Henry Ford who said "if you think you can or cannot do something, you're right"
AAAAAAHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHHH! That is one of my favorite quotes of all time! I never thought that it would pertain to Video making to other people as it does to me! Well That just made me really excited when I saw that
i'm going to say yes if he's doing this himself. If he's helping out with an experienced videographer, then no 15 is not too young. I started helping out when I was 14, started shooting my own when i was 17. You have to get a wide depth of knowledge about different religions and customs to be able to know how to produce a quality keepsake for a bride and groom.
Does he have any other professional experience? Any quality videos that he can show for portfolio purposes? It can be anything at all as long as it can demonstrate his ability to shoot a good scene and put together a good production. I agree what what a lot of other folks on here have said. If he can do a year or two as second or third cameraman then he can pick up on some things from more experienced photographers and move into his own later.
He is probably too young from legal point, too young to enter legal contract. On the other hand, he may offer a fresh look and a hype appealing to the young couples. I agree that it could be easier to start working for established producers. But it's always worth trying. The necessity of 3 cameras is a myth and often a gimmick to suck more money from the marrying couple. Good professional is able to do wonders with one good camera. It's a good idea to have a back up camera handy though
Good luck, go for it! It's a hard work, but pays well and is a lot of fun.
Shoot-It-Yourself Wedding Video
The necessity of 3 cameras is a myth and often a gimmick to suck more money from the marrying couple. A good professional is able to do wonders with one good camera. It's a good idea to have a back up camera handy though Good luck, go for it!
I will agree that the necessity for three cameras is a myth BUT... The necessity for (at least) two cameras is not a myth.
Any seasoned wedding videographer knows that you should not have less than two cameras. Personally I use three. I don't charge any more for three than I would for two. I only have three (plus two extras as backup) for ease of editing. If I am moving one camera and my 2nd camera operator is moving at the same time as I am, both of those shots are out, so the the 3rd camera is there with a nice static shot that I can always rely on.
This 3rd camera has been a life saver more than once. The extra cameras are just backup in case something happens to the others. I usually don't use or even download that footage.
Yes... I know the argument, and I have already responded once to it a few months ago on these forums.
"A good videographer can make a quality production from just one camera." And that's all well and good but it takes twice the time to try to manipulate that one shot to make something that the bride and groom will actually want to (or more importantly) or be able to watch without getting a head ache. An hour long static shot is boring. A besides, why put myself through all of that extra (editing) work when I don't have to?