Here's my situation: I own a Canon XL1 and a Canon GL2. Both of these cameras LCD's and viewfinders are set up for shooting in 4:3 (which was pretty much the norm when they were manufactured). Anyway, obviously, everything is headed in the 16:9 direction, so I was debating shooting both cameras in 16:9, which they're both capable of doing. Unfortunately, when you switch to 16:9, the image you see in the viewfinder is squished and out of proportion. After some more playing around, I noticed that when I hook my camera up to a widescreen TV, there is basically no difference in the footage shot in 4:3 or the footage shot in 16:9. So, my question is, is there any drawback to just continuing to shoot in 4:3 knowing that it will most likely be viewed in 16:9? The new widescreen TV's appear to stretch the image quite well without really looking out of proportion or "stretched", and I'm still able to compose my shots well in my camera's viewfinder. Any thoughts, comments, advice would be appreciated.







