<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Videomaker Community Forums &#187; Tag: ZR800 - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</link>
<description>Videomaker Community Forums &#187; Tag: ZR800 - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:27:44 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>ralck on "Is there a difference?"</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/is-there-a-difference#post-37668</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 09:29:38 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>ralck</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">37668@http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hello,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;SoÂ I wantÂ to buy aÂ secondÂ camera,Â and I'm interestedÂ in the Canon ZR800 or ZR900Â as they offer a microphoneÂ input (I haven't found other consumer-based cameras that offer this).Â Â IÂ don'tÂ haveÂ aÂ ton of money, andÂ thisÂ camera doesn'tÂ needÂ to beÂ all thatÂ goodÂ as my VX2000Â will be used as my mainÂ camera still.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;ItÂ seemsÂ toÂ me that the ZR900 isÂ simply the '08 model and onlyÂ really offersÂ aÂ slightly longerÂ zoom,Â something that doesn'tÂ matter all that muchÂ toÂ me. Â Is the CCD any different? Â It's still a 1-CCD 1/6&#34; chip, so my guess is it's going to be virtually identical picture quality (assuming the operator knows how to use the camera).&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;IÂ think IÂ read that the ZR800Â isÂ aÂ bottom-loadingÂ camera whereÂ asÂ the 900Â is top loading?Â Â I'veÂ never ownedÂ aÂ bottom-loadingÂ camera; isÂ thisÂ a major problem or hassle?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;ThereÂ aren'tÂ a tonÂ of greatÂ reviews online aboutÂ the ZR900Â which furtherÂ leads meÂ to believe that the twoÂ camerasÂ are identical andÂ I mightÂ as wellÂ save myselfÂ 50Â bucks andÂ go with the ZR800, but I'm open to have my mind changed. :)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks!&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

