<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Videomaker Community Forums &#187; Tag: QNNtv - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</link>
<description>Videomaker Community Forums &#187; Tag: QNNtv - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 10:01:07 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>JodieQNNtv on "Which Platform Dilemma"</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/which-platform-dilemma#post-44204</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 25 Feb 2009 08:48:02 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>JodieQNNtv</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">44204@http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I'm going to being shooting short segments for our Web video channel, plus pickup footage for a show that is professionally produced. (I'm the talent. These will be little woman-on-the-street pieces. Short and sweet, and some small pieces from my studio, little how-to's and messages to our viewers.)&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Currently I have a PC and am going to buy a new desktop for the light editing I'll be doing. My videographer uses Final Cut Pro.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;My question is, shouldÂ I go the Mac route so I can use FC Express? Will that make it easier on Ivan, my editor? I was told that it doesn't matter sinceÂ I have to save the files as quick time anyway, thatÂ I could go the PCm Adobe route. But another reputable source said life will by much easier for both of usÂ ifÂ I go the Mac route.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I have to substantiate this to those who hold the purse strings. Help!&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

