<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Videomaker Community Forums &#187; Tag: HP - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</link>
<description>Videomaker Community Forums &#187; Tag: HP - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Thu, 16 Feb 2012 17:11:57 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>composite1 on "A High End &#039;Puter That Just Got Better"</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/a-high-end-puter-that-just-got-better#post-57384</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 14 Apr 2010 07:30:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>composite1</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">57384@http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Last year I tossed out HP's Z800 Workstation for the PC guys to drool over. Well it just got better and though it's out of the price range of many of VM's readers, the Z800 is now faster, more efficient power-wise, quieter and is not any more expensive than the original model!&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;For the serious gearheads on the forums the new Z800 has shucked off the twin Nehalem Quadcores and put on a pair of Westmere Six Core 3.33 GHz processors (yes, I said '6' cores.) There's much more but I won't spoil the 'drool factor'. Take a look at the article at Studio Daily for a look at the new HPZ800.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;&#60;a href=&#34;http://www.studiodaily.com/main/12108.html&#34;&#62;http://www.studiodaily.com/main/12108.html&#60;/a&#62;&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Kyalami on "Video Card w/100W PSU"</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/video-card-w100w-psu#post-49081</link>
<pubDate>Sun, 12 Jul 2009 21:09:10 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Kyalami</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">49081@http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hello everyone! I have a very old, but nonetheless great, HP Pavilion&#60;br /&#62;
6645c. It has an Intel Celeron 533MHz Mendocino processor, and the&#60;br /&#62;
Intel 810 chipset. Although it was designed to run Windows 98, I've&#60;br /&#62;
been able to put Windows 2000 on the machine with no problems at all.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;
The computer has three PCI expansion slots, on an old TriGem Cognac&#60;br /&#62;
motherboard. The graphics it uses are integrated, provided by the Intel&#60;br /&#62;
810 chipset. While the system is running great, the graphics really&#60;br /&#62;
slow it down. I want to use this computer for basic IM/email needs -&#60;br /&#62;
not expecting even good Flash support (i.e. Youtube, other online&#60;br /&#62;
video), however, some graphics-heavy, yet non-video-centric sites (i.e.&#60;br /&#62;
Tom's Hardware) run a quite slow.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;
Basically, I want to ask if adding a simple PCI graphics card (I'm&#60;br /&#62;
thinking of maybe a 32MB ATI RAGE) would work well despite the 100W&#60;br /&#62;
power supply that comes with the machine. The PSU is also very&#60;br /&#62;
limiting, but if the possibility of adding a simple graphics card is&#60;br /&#62;
available and worth it, then I'd like to take advantage of it. I just&#60;br /&#62;
don't want to install it and then start encounterin power/random&#60;br /&#62;
shutdown problems, which I know are a pain and have the potential to&#60;br /&#62;
mess up other components severely.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62; The manual for the TriGem Cognac motherboard that is in the&#60;br /&#62;
machine acknowledges PCI graphics cards (in one part, it states that&#60;br /&#62;
the onboard graphics will automatically be disabled upon the insertion&#60;br /&#62;
of a PCI video card) so I know that it was a possibility. But I'd like&#60;br /&#62;
to know how far I can go with that 100W PSU.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;
 Thanks in advance for the help,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;
 Kyalami         &#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>AJackson on "Apple,HP or Dell for video editing?"</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/applehp-or-dell-for-video-editing#post-37248</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 07 Jun 2008 11:46:56 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>AJackson</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">37248@http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Looking for a good computer forÂ video editing that costs no more than $2,500[including monitor].Here are the three that I have considered:Mac Pro,HP elite m9280 and Dell xps420.Among those, which is the best for video editing?Any other suggestions?&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>Alukahn on "DVD Printer Dilemma"</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/dvd-printer-dilemma#post-36980</link>
<pubDate>Thu, 29 May 2008 16:08:50 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>Alukahn</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">36980@http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Â I'm looking to buy an inexpensive printer that prints onto DVD's.Â  I don't print a lot, so speed isn't as critical for me.Â  Quality should be good, but doesn't have to be perfect.Â  I'm thinking about the HP C5280, but I've seen wildly different reviews.Â  I know most recommend the Epsons, but I've had issues with my RX595 clogging and can't afford the ink (I'm actually waiting on a replacement from Epson).Â  I've read that the Pixma's are good, but given my experience with Epson am not crazy about internal printheads.Â  Does anyone have any long-term experience with HP or any suggestions as to another DVD capable printer?&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

