<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Videomaker Community Forums &#187; Tag: documentary. ntsc vs pal - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</link>
<description>Videomaker Community Forums &#187; Tag: documentary. ntsc vs pal - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Sat, 18 Feb 2012 08:47:35 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>stevem on "NSTC to PAL conversion quality?"</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/nstc-to-pal-conversion-quality#post-35066</link>
<pubDate>Tue, 12 Feb 2008 21:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>stevem</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">35066@http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;Hi there,&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I'm new filmmaker, looking for a little advice.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We're filming a three-part documentary in Asia over a long period of time and the first two parts have been filmed in PAL format where the cameras used had that standard.Â  In China I changed cameras to a NTSC model bought through ebay that was an absolutely fantastic deal.Â  I knew I was buying a different format, and friends and advisors helped convince me that it shouldn't be too much of a problem.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;However now I'm having second thoughts and the film's producers aren't happy.Â  I'm a new camerman/director myself and since we've only just begun the shoot in China, I don't want to continue down what might be a blind alley for a final edit.Â  After looking over other forums and the great NTSC v. PAL debate, it seems that PAL may offer better quality, but since I already now own an NTSC cam, I'm more concerned about the loss of quality in the transfer from NTSC back to PAL in the final edit.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;We're shooting on a solid Sony DSR-PD170 NTSC camera with a timeframe of two more weeks approx to solve this.Â  I see the following options available.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;1). Sell the NTSC Camera and buy a PAL version (thus minimising future damage)&#60;br /&#62;
2). Exchange for a PAL camera in Hong Kong&#60;br /&#62;
3). Restrict NTSC to PAL transfer time to the final edit (thus saving costs) and push ahead with what we have.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Of the three, Option (1) may not be possible, if I can't sell the camera at the same rate I bought it, as my budget will be shot.Â  Option 2 is wishful thinking at best.Â  Option 3 seems the most sensible/logical, but will even the best transfer machines/algrothims result in a huge loss of quality?&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Eventually, I hope to sell this film to a TV network so quality is very important.Â  The film has not been pre-sold as yet.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;I would really appreciate any thoughts or expert opinions at this stage.Â  Option 3 seems sensible, but if the quality is a loser, then I don't want this documentary to be.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Thanks.&#60;br /&#62;
Steve&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

