<?xml version="1.0"?><!-- generator="bbPress" -->

<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
>

<channel>
<title>Videomaker Community Forums &#187; Tag: difference - Recent Topics</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</link>
<description>Videomaker Community Forums &#187; Tag: difference - Recent Topics</description>
<language>en</language>
<pubDate>Fri, 17 Feb 2012 15:00:07 +0000</pubDate>

<item>
<title>FDEditor on "What&#039;s the difference?"</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/whats-the-difference#post-40740</link>
<pubDate>Wed, 15 Oct 2008 13:42:19 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>FDEditor</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">40740@http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I know that people (regardless of occupation) have preferred tools for various reasons, whether it's familiarity, sentimentality or whatever.Â In the most recent issue of VM, there's a review of the new Avid. Living within walking distance of WB, Disney, Nickelodeon, etc, I'm fully aware of Avid's position in the industry. However, I'm wondering why it holds such prominence in the industry compared to Premiere or other NLE's. I'm well aware of its dominance early on, but why do Avid users contiunue to say it's so far ahead of Premiere? At home,Â I have a version of Premiere from a long time ago (I've mainly concentrated on web design for the past 10 years), but now I'm editing video at work and am using CS3 and the difference is night and day.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;The reason I ask is for my home system. When I upgrade my system at home, I might get Avid, but is the difference in the software great enough to justify paying for a new version of Avid that would be twice as much as anÂ upgrade to Production Premium CS4? Also, I look at what happened with QuarkXPress. It was the industry standard in print because there was no alternative that could touch it. However, InDesign came along and now people are jumping to ID (and there are several Quark-hating blogs out there) and leaving Quark behind. If Avid is better, why is it so much better? What can it do that Premiere can't?&#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>
<item>
<title>raywatts on "Difference between JVC HD1OOU and JVC HD111U"</title>
<link>http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/topic/diffence-between-jvc-hd1oou-and-jvc-hd111u#post-38791</link>
<pubDate>Sat, 26 Jul 2008 19:51:43 +0000</pubDate>
<dc:creator>raywatts</dc:creator>
<guid isPermaLink="false">38791@http://www.videomaker.com/community/forums/</guid>
<description>&#60;p&#62;I am thinking of buying one of these cameras but am a little confused about the two models. Also I am in Australia and would like to purchase the camera from the USA. Is the US version especially for the NSTC system or can they function on PAL as well? Any help on this or general thoughts on the camera would be much appreciated.&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Many thanks&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;Ray Watts&#60;/p&#62;
&#60;p&#62;SydneyÃ‚Â &#60;/p&#62;</description>
</item>

</channel>
</rss>

