Sign up now and get a free Tip Sheet for Videographers!

Wireless Microphone Review: Nady Systems 351 Wireless Microphone Kit (page 2)

Who's it For?

The Nady 351 is a decent system for the price. No, you won't get the performance of a rack-mounted true diversity UHF wireless system. However, you won't pay nearly as much for the 351 as one of those professional-level systems. If you are just getting started, and want a wireless microphone system, the Nady 351 could be the perfect system for you. If you want the best performance possible, you'll need to spend more money and get yourself a true diversity UHF system.

TECH SPECS

System Ultra Compact VHF transmitter and receiver
Transmitting Frequency: between 170MHz-218MHz
Output: mini mike jack, mini headphone jack
Frequency Response: 25-20,000Hz
Max SPL: 120dB (to A-weighted noise level)
Power: receiver 1x9-volt battery, transmitter 1x9-volt battery

Nady LT-20 lavalier
Physical Type: >lavalier
Transducer: condenser
Pickup Pattern: n/a
Output impedance: 600 [OMEGA Symbol for Ohms]
Dimensions: Transmitter 3 7/8 (height) x 2 3/8 (width) x 7/8 (depth) inches, Receiver 3 /38 (height) x 2 7/16 (width) x 7/8 (depth) inches (minus shoe mount)
Weight: transmitter 3.7 ounces, receiver 3.1 ounces (minus battery)

Strengths
  • relatively inexpensive
  • compact
  • no adapters required for camcorder use
Weaknesses
  • because of loose battery connection, it didn't work out of the box
  • sound quality could have been better
  • VHF
SUMMARY

This inexpensive wireless unit is good for amateur productions, but advanced videographers might want more from a wireless.

Nady Systems, Inc.
6701 Bay Street
Emeryville, CA 94608
(510) 652-2411
www.nadywireless.com

$280

Page: 1 2
  • Sponsors

Rate This Article

Rating: 1 (Poor) - 5 (Excellent)

1 2 3 4 5
How would you rate the author of this article?
How Would you rate the overall value of this article?
How would you rate the graphics?
How would you rate this article's method (i.e interview, tutorial, narrative) for explaining this topic?
How would you rate the depth and length of the article